Study_about_change_in_intelligence_in_children_9–12_from_screen_time_watching,_screen_time_Socializing,_screen_time_gaming.webp
Size of this PNG preview of this WEBP file:
800 × 403 pixels
.
Other resolutions:
320 × 161 pixels
|
640 × 323 pixels
|
1,024 × 516 pixels
|
2,007 × 1,012 pixels
.
Summary
Description Study about change in intelligence in children 9–12 from screen time watching, screen time Socializing, screen time gaming.webp |
English:
"Path diagram of a strict measurement invariant Latent Change Score model with the change in intelligence from ages 9–10 to 11–12. Screen time Watching, Screen time Socializing, Screen time Gaming, cogPGS (Polygenic scores for cognitive performance), and SES (socioeconomic status) are exogenous variables, each already accounting for the effect of the others on baseline intelligence and on the change in intelligence after two years. All variables are standardized. (Which is why the loadings differ between time points—the constraining of loadings and intercepts must be done for the unstandardized estimates.) Non-significant values are marked with “n.s.”. Following convention, rectangles represent observed or exogenous variables and circles represent latent variables (screen time types are shown with only one rectangle for aesthetic reasons—they are actually three distinct rectangles). Single-headed arrows denote regression weights, while double-headed arrows represent variances, covariances, or errors. Standardized betas."
|
Date | |
Source | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-11341-2 |
Author | Authors of the study: Bruno Sauce, Magnus Liebherr, Nicholas Judd & Torkel Klingberg |
Licensing
This file is licensed under the
Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International
license.
-
You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
-
Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.