Binary_BCF_versus_VCF_format.png
Size of this preview:
800 × 324 pixels
.
Other resolutions:
320 × 129 pixels
|
640 × 259 pixels
|
1,340 × 542 pixels
.
Summary
Description Binary BCF versus VCF format.png |
English:
BCF, the binary representation of the VCF format, is much faster to process than VCF for two reasons. First, it avoids the expensive conversion from text to the internal binary representation. Second, the fields in BCF are rearranged to allow rapid access to specific value of any sample. This is achieved by storing values in blocks of the same type rather than per-sample, with offsets to blocks determined on the fly.
|
Date | |
Source | HTSlib: C library for reading/writing high-throughput sequencing data, GigaScience, Volume 10, Issue 2, February 2021, giab007, (see the supplemental files, all published open access0. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giab007 and https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/10/2/giab007/6139334?searchresult=1 |
Author | James K Bonfield, John Marshall, Petr Danecek, Heng Li, Valeriu Ohan, Andrew Whitwham, Thomas Keane, Robert M Davies |
Licensing
This file is licensed under the
Creative Commons
Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
license.
-
You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
-
Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.