United_States_v._Lawrence

<i>United States v. Lawrence</i>

United States v. Lawrence

1795 United States Supreme Court case


United States v. Lawrence, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 42 (1795), was a United States Supreme Court case determining that the Supreme Court cannot normally compel a federal trial judge to proceed in a case which he feels is lacking sufficient evidence to proceed. In the case, the court held:

Where a judge of the district court, acting in his judicial capacity, determined that evidence was not sufficient to authorize him to proceed in a case before him, this Court has no power to compel him to decide according to the dictates of any judgment but his own, whatever might be the difference of sentiment entertained by the court.

A motion was made by the Attorney General of the United States (Bradford) for a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not be directed to John Lawrence, Judge of the District of New York, in order to compel him to issue a warrant, for apprehending Captain Barre, commander of the frigate Le Perdrix, belonging to the French Republic.[1]

Quick Facts United States v. Lawrence, Argued February 18, 1795 Decided March 3, 1795 ...

See also


References

  1. United States v. Lawrence, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 42 (1795).

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article United_States_v._Lawrence, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.