Eastview_Birth_Control_Trial

Eastview Birth Control Trial

Eastview Birth Control Trial

Canadian criminal trial

The Eastview Birth Control Trial was an important event in the history of contraception in Canada. In keeping with contemporary Christian views on contraception, the dissemination of information and the possession of materials relating to birth control were illegal in Canada. The trial was the first successful legal challenge, and it marked the beginning of a shift in Canadian society's acceptance towards such practices (McLaren and McLaren, 85–87).

On September 14, 1936, 28-year-old Dorothea Palmer was arrested in Eastview (now Vanier, Ontario), where a large number of people of French-Canadian or Irish ancestry made up the town's population of about 4,000.[1] Palmer was charged under section 207 of the Criminal Code for possessing and distributing materials and pamphlets related to birth control.[2][3] As she was working for the Kitchener-based Parents' Information Bureau (PIB), her arrest could have led to the collapse of the organization and as many as two years' imprisonment for Palmer. However, the PIB was the brainchild of industrialist A.R. Kaufman, a eugenically minded industrialist, whose family founded Kaufman Rubber Company.[4] His financial support and the hiring of defense attorney F. W. Wegenast would eventually see Palmer's charges dropped.[4][5] The trial lasted from September 1936 to March 1937.[6]: 2 

Ultimately, the case was dismissed by the presiding magistrate Lester H. Clayton, who ruled that, as Palmer's actions were "in the public good," no charges could be held against her.[6]: 44  In his final ruling, he explained that:

The mothers are in poor health, pregnant nine months of the year ... What chance do these children have to be properly fed, clothed and educated? They are a burden on the taxpayer. They crowd the juvenile court. They glut the competitive labour market.[7]

Although contraception was not fully legalized in Canada until 1969, Palmer was the only person to be prosecuted for providing information about birth control.[8][4]

See also

References

  1. [1]
    Stephenson, Bill (23 November 1957). "The Great Birth Control Trial". Maclean's. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
  2. [2]
    Stortz, Gerald; Eaton, Murray (1 April 1983). ""Pro Bono Publico" The Eastview Birth Control Trial". Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice. 8 (2): 51–60. ISSN 1715-0698. Retrieved 12 August 2017.
  3. [3]
    Skuy, Percy (April 1999). "Canadian Pioneers in Family Planning". Journal SOGC. 21 (4): 377–384. doi:10.1016/S0849-5831(16)30075-1.
  4. [4]
    Buck, Genna (4 June 2019). "How birth control became legal in Canada. It starts with an eugenicist". National Post. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
  5. [5]
    Revie, Linda (2006). "More than just boots! The eugenic and commercial concerns behind A. R. Kaufman's birth controlling activities". Canadian Bulletin of Medical History. 23 (1): 119–43. doi:10.3138/cbmh.23.1.119. PMID 17152242.(subscription may be required or content may be available in libraries)
  6. [6]
    Beswick, Lorne (2017). Reds in Beds: The Communist Party of Canada and the Politics of Reproduction, 1920-1970 (PhD). Queen's University.
  7. [7]
    "Birth Control Case Dismissed". The Globe. Mar 18, 1937. p. 3.
  8. [8]
    Hollobon, Joan (30 November 1978). "Did dirty work for men at trial, pioneer of birth control says". The Globe and Mail. p. T3.
  • Beswick, Lorne. "Reds in Beds: The Communist Party of Canada and the Politics of Reproduction, 1920-1970," Ph.D. Thesis: Queen's University, 2017.
  • McLaren, Angus and Arlene Tigar McLaren. The Bedroom and the State: The Changing Practices and Politics of Contraception and Abortion in Canada, 1880-1980. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1986.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Eastview_Birth_Control_Trial, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.