Cardiac_marker

Cardiac marker

Cardiac markers are biomarkers measured to evaluate heart function. They can be useful in the early prediction or diagnosis of disease.[1] Although they are often discussed in the context of myocardial infarction, other conditions can lead to an elevation in cardiac marker level.[2][3]

Quick Facts LOINC ...

Most of the early markers identified were enzymes, and as a result, the term "cardiac enzymes" is sometimes used. However, not all of the markers currently used are enzymes. For example, in formal usage, troponin would not be listed as a cardiac enzyme.[4]

Applications of measurement

Measuring cardiac biomarkers can be a step toward making a diagnosis for a condition. Whereas cardiac imaging often confirms a diagnosis, simpler and less expensive cardiac biomarker measurements can advise a physician whether more complicated or invasive procedures are warranted. In many cases medical societies advise doctors to make biomarker measurements an initial testing strategy especially for patients at low risk of cardiac death.[5][6]

Many acute cardiac marker IVD products are targeted at nontraditional markets, e.g., the hospital ER instead of traditional hospital or clinical laboratory environments. Competition in the development of cardiac marker diagnostic products and their expansion into new markets is intense.[7]

Recently, the intentional destruction of myocardium by alcohol septal ablation has led to the identification of additional potential markers.[8]

Types

Types of cardiac markers include the following:

More information Test, Sensitivity and specificity ...

Limitations

Reference ranges for blood tests, measured in units, including several cardiac markers.

Depending on the marker, it can take between 2 and 24 hours for the level to increase in the blood. Additionally, determining the levels of cardiac markers in the laboratory - like many other lab measurements - takes substantial time. Cardiac markers are therefore not useful in diagnosing a myocardial infarction in the acute phase. The clinical presentation and results from an ECG are more appropriate in the acute situation.[citation needed]

However, in 2010, research at the Baylor College of Medicine revealed that, using diagnostic nanochips and a swab of the cheek, cardiac biomarker readings from saliva can, with the ECG readings, determine within minutes whether someone is likely to have had a heart attack[citation needed].

See also


References

  1. Rao SP, Miller S, Rosenbaum R, Lakier JB (2019). "Opportunities for microRNAs in the Crowded Field of Cardiovascular Biomarkers". Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease. 14: 211–238. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012827. PMC 6442682. PMID 30332561.
  2. Hadziselimovic E, Greve AM, Sajadieh A, Olsen MH, Kesäniemi YA, Nienaber CA, Ray SG, Rossebø AB, Wachtell K, Nielsen OW (April 2023). "Association of high-sensitivity troponin T with outcomes in asymptomatic non-severe aortic stenosis: a post-hoc substudy of the SEAS trial". eClinicalMedicine. 58: 101875. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101875. ISSN 2589-5370. PMC 10006443. PMID 36915288.
  3. Hadziselimovic E, Greve AM, Sajadieh A, Olsen MH, Kesäniemi YA, Nienaber CA, Ray SG, Rossebø AB, Willenheimer R, Wachtell K, Nielsen OW (2022-04-01). "Association of Annual N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Measurements With Clinical Events in Patients With Asymptomatic Nonsevere Aortic Stenosis: A Post Hoc Substudy of the SEAS Trial". JAMA Cardiology. 7 (4): 435–444. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.5916. ISSN 2380-6583. PMC 8851368. PMID 35171199.
  4. Rao SP, Miller S, Rosenbaum R, Lakier JB (August 1999). "Cardiac troponin I and cardiac enzymes after electrophysiologic studies, ablations, and defibrillator implantations". Am. J. Cardiol. 84 (4): 470, A9. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00337-9. PMID 10468091.
  5. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, "Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question" (PDF), Choosing Wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-04-16, retrieved August 17, 2012
  6. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, Heidenreich PA, Henkin RE, Pellikka PA, Pohost GM, Williams KA, American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, American College Of R, American Heart A, American Society of Echocardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Society Of Nuclear M (2009). "ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 53 (23): 2201–2229. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.013. PMID 19497454.
  7. "Cardiac Marker Diagnostic Testing Markets". TriMark Publications, LLC. November 2011.
  8. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Comelli I, Cervellin G (2013). "Glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis". Biochem Med (Zagreb). 23 (1): 78–82. doi:10.11613/bm.2013.010. PMC 3900091. PMID 23457768.

Further reading

  • Ross G, Bever F, Uddin Z, Devireddy L, Gardin J (2004). "Common scenarios to clarify the interpretation of cardiac markers". J Am Osteopath Assoc. 104 (4): 165–76. PMID 15127984.Full text

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Cardiac_marker, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.