U.S._v_Behrman

<i>United States v. Behrman</i>

United States v. Behrman

1922 United States Supreme Court case


United States v. Behrman, 258 U.S. 280 (1922), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a violation of the Harrison Narcotics Act did not require a mens rea element and was thus a strict liability crime.[1]

Quick Facts United States v. Behrman, Argued March 7, 1922 Decided March 27, 1922 ...

Background

The defendant was a licensed physician that wrote prescriptions to Willie King for 150 grains of heroin, 360 grains of morphine, and 210 grains of cocaine as part of a maintenance treatment. The defendant was indicted under the Harrison Act, but the district court dismissed the indictment.[2]

Decision

The Supreme Court held that the facts were sufficient to support an indictment. The court held that the violation of the Harrison Act was a statutory offense, and because Congress had not written in a mental state element as part of the offense that the Court should not do so.[3]

Dissent

Justice Holmes, joined by Justices Brandeis and McReynolds, dissented, saying that if the doctor had given the prescriptions in good faith and with reasonable care that he should have a defense.[4]

See also


References

  1. Bonnie, R.J. et al. Criminal Law, Second Edition. Foundation Press, New York: 2004, p. 262
  2. Bonnie, p. 261
  3. Bonnie, p. 263
  4. Bonnie, p. 262

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article U.S._v_Behrman, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.