Multi-agent_systems

Multi-agent system

Multi-agent system

Built of multiple interacting agents


A multi-agent system (MAS or "self-organized system") is a computerized system composed of multiple interacting intelligent agents.[1] Multi-agent systems can solve problems that are difficult or impossible for an individual agent or a monolithic system to solve.[2] Intelligence may include methodic, functional, procedural approaches, algorithmic search or reinforcement learning.[3]

Simple reflex agent
Learning agent

Despite considerable overlap, a multi-agent system is not always the same as an agent-based model (ABM). The goal of an ABM is to search for explanatory insight into the collective behavior of agents (which do not necessarily need to be "intelligent") obeying simple rules, typically in natural systems, rather than in solving specific practical or engineering problems. The terminology of ABM tends to be used more often in the science, and MAS in engineering and technology.[4] Applications where multi-agent systems research may deliver an appropriate approach include online trading,[5] disaster response,[6][7] target surveillance[8] and social structure modelling.[9]

Concept

Multi-agent systems consist of agents and their environment. Typically multi-agent systems research refers to software agents. However, the agents in a multi-agent system could equally well be robots, humans or human teams. A multi-agent system may contain combined human-agent teams.

Agents can be divided into types spanning simple to complex. Categories include:

  • Passive agents[10] or "agent without goals" (such as obstacle, apple or key in any simple simulation)
  • Active agents[10] with simple goals (like birds in flocking, or wolf–sheep in prey-predator model)
  • Cognitive agents (complex calculations)

Agent environments can be divided into:

  • Virtual
  • Discrete
  • Continuous

Agent environments can also be organized according to properties such as accessibility (whether it is possible to gather complete information about the environment), determinism (whether an action causes a definite effect), dynamics (how many entities influence the environment in the moment), discreteness (whether the number of possible actions in the environment is finite), episodicity (whether agent actions in certain time periods influence other periods),[11] and dimensionality (whether spatial characteristics are important factors of the environment and the agent considers space in its decision making).[12] Agent actions are typically mediated via an appropriate middleware. This middleware offers a first-class design abstraction for multi-agent systems, providing means to govern resource access and agent coordination.[13]

Characteristics

The agents in a multi-agent system have several important characteristics:[14]

  • Autonomy: agents at least partially independent, self-aware, autonomous
  • Local views: no agent has a full global view, or the system is too complex for an agent to exploit such knowledge
  • Decentralization: no agent is designated as controlling (or the system is effectively reduced to a monolithic system)[15]

Self-organisation and self-direction

Multi-agent systems can manifest self-organisation as well as self-direction and other control paradigms and related complex behaviors even when the individual strategies of all their agents are simple.[citation needed] When agents can share knowledge using any agreed language, within the constraints of the system's communication protocol, the approach may lead to a common improvement. Example languages are Knowledge Query Manipulation Language (KQML) or Agent Communication Language (ACL).

System paradigms

Many MAS are implemented in computer simulations, stepping the system through discrete "time steps". The MAS components communicate typically using a weighted request matrix, e.g.

 Speed-VERY_IMPORTANT: min=45 mph, 
 Path length-MEDIUM_IMPORTANCE: max=60 expectedMax=40, 
 Max-Weight-UNIMPORTANT 
 Contract Priority-REGULAR 

and a weighted response matrix, e.g.

 Speed-min:50 but only if weather sunny, 
 Path length:25 for sunny / 46 for rainy
 Contract Priority-REGULAR
 note – ambulance will override this priority and you'll have to wait

A challenge-response-contract scheme is common in MAS systems, where

  • First a "Who can?" question is distributed.
  • Only the relevant components respond: "I can, at this price".
  • Finally, a contract is set up, usually in several short communication steps between sides,

also considering other components, evolving "contracts" and the restriction sets of the component algorithms.

Another paradigm commonly used with MAS is the "pheromone", where components leave information for other nearby components. These pheromones may evaporate/concentrate with time, that is their values may decrease (or increase).

Properties

MAS tend to find the best solution for their problems without intervention. There is high similarity here to physical phenomena, such as energy minimizing, where physical objects tend to reach the lowest energy possible within the physically constrained world. For example: many of the cars entering a metropolis in the morning will be available for leaving that same metropolis in the evening.

The systems also tend to prevent propagation of faults, self-recover and be fault tolerant, mainly due to the redundancy of components.

Research

The study of multi-agent systems is "concerned with the development and analysis of sophisticated AI problem-solving and control architectures for both single-agent and multiple-agent systems."[16] Research topics include:

Frameworks

Frameworks have emerged that implement common standards (such as the FIPA and OMG MASIF standards).[23] These frameworks e.g. JADE, save time and aid in the standardization of MAS development.[24]

Currently though, no standard is actively maintained from FIPA or OMG. Efforts for further development of software agents in industrial context are carried out in IEEE IES technical committee on Industrial Agents.[25]

Applications

MAS have not only been applied in academic research, but also in industry.[26] MAS are applied in the real world to graphical applications such as computer games. Agent systems have been used in films.[27] It is widely advocated for use in networking and mobile technologies, to achieve automatic and dynamic load balancing, high scalability and self-healing networks. They are being used for coordinated defence systems.

Other applications[28] include transportation,[29] logistics,[30] graphics, manufacturing, power system,[31] smartgrids,[32] and the GIS.

Also, Multi-agent Systems Artificial Intelligence (MAAI) are used for simulating societies, the purpose thereof being helpful in the fields of climate, energy, epidemiology, conflict management, child abuse, ....[33] Some organisations working on using multi-agent system models include Center for Modelling Social Systems, Centre for Research in Social Simulation, Centre for Policy Modelling, Society for Modelling and Simulation International.[33]

Vehicular traffic with controlled autonomous vehicles can be modelling as a multi-agent system involving crowd dynamics.[34] Hallerbach et al. discussed the application of agent-based approaches for the development and validation of automated driving systems via a digital twin of the vehicle-under-test and microscopic traffic simulation based on independent agents.[35] Waymo has created a multi-agent simulation environment Carcraft to test algorithms for self-driving cars.[36][37] It simulates traffic interactions between human drivers, pedestrians and automated vehicles. People's behavior is imitated by artificial agents based on data of real human behavior.

See also


References

  1. Yoav Shoham, Kevin Leyton-Brown. Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 2009. http://www.masfoundations.org/
  2. Hu, J.; Turgut, A.; Lennox, B.; Arvin, F., "Robust Formation Coordination of Robot Swarms with Nonlinear Dynamics and Unknown Disturbances: Design and Experiments" IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 2021.
  3. Stefano V. Albrecht, Filippos Christianos, Lukas Schäfer. Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Foundations and Modern Approaches. MIT Press, 2024. https://www.marl-book.com/
  4. Niazi, Muaz; Hussain, Amir (2011). "Agent-based Computing from Multi-agent Systems to Agent-Based Models: A Visual Survey" (PDF). Scientometrics. 89 (2): 479–499. arXiv:1708.05872. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0468-9. hdl:1893/3378. S2CID 17934527.
  5. Rogers, Alex; David, E.; Schiff, J.; Jennings, N.R. (2007). "The Effects of Proxy Bidding and Minimum Bid Increments within eBay Auctions". ACM Transactions on the Web. 1 (2): 9–es. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.65.4539. doi:10.1145/1255438.1255441. S2CID 207163424. Archived from the original on April 2, 2010. Retrieved March 18, 2008.
  6. Schurr, Nathan; Marecki, Janusz; Tambe, Milind; Scerri, Paul; Kasinadhuni, Nikhil; Lewis, J.P. (2005). "The Future of Disaster Response: Humans Working with Multiagent Teams using DEFACTO". Archived (PDF) from the original on June 3, 2013. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
  7. Genc, Zulkuf; et al. (2013). "Agent-Based Information Infrastructure for Disaster Management" (PDF). Intelligent Systems for Crisis Management. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. pp. 349–355. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33218-0_26. ISBN 978-3-642-33217-3.
  8. Hu, Junyan; Bhowmick, Parijat; Lanzon, Alexander (2020). "Distributed Adaptive Time-Varying Group Formation Tracking for Multiagent Systems With Multiple Leaders on Directed Graphs". IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems. 7: 140–150. doi:10.1109/TCNS.2019.2913619. S2CID 149609966.
  9. Sun, Ron; Naveh, Isaac (June 30, 2004). "Simulating Organizational Decision-Making Using a Cognitively Realistic Agent Model". Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation.
  10. Kubera, Yoann; Mathieu, Philippe; Picault, Sébastien (2010), "Everything can be Agent!" (PDF), Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS'2010): 1547–1548
  11. Russell, Stuart J.; Norvig, Peter (2003), Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (2nd ed.), Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-790395-2
  12. Salamon, Tomas (2011). Design of Agent-Based Models. Repin: Bruckner Publishing. p. 22. ISBN 978-80-904661-1-1.
  13. Weyns, Danny; Omicini, Amdrea; Odell, James (2007). "Environment as a first-class abstraction in multiagent systems". Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 14 (1): 5–30. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.154.4480. doi:10.1007/s10458-006-0012-0. S2CID 13347050.
  14. Wooldridge, Michael (2002). An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. John Wiley & Sons. p. 366. ISBN 978-0-471-49691-5.
  15. Panait, Liviu; Luke, Sean (2005). "Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning: The State of the Art" (PDF). Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 11 (3): 387–434. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.307.6671. doi:10.1007/s10458-005-2631-2. S2CID 19706.
  16. Albrecht, Stefano; Stone, Peter (2017), "Multiagent Learning: Foundations and Recent Trends. Tutorial", IJCAI-17 conference (PDF)
  17. Cucker, Felipe; Steve Smale (2007). "The Mathematics of Emergence" (PDF). Japanese Journal of Mathematics. 2: 197–227. doi:10.1007/s11537-007-0647-x. S2CID 2637067. Retrieved June 9, 2008.
  18. Shen, Jackie (Jianhong) (2008). "Cucker–Smale Flocking under Hierarchical Leadership". SIAM J. Appl. Math. 68 (3): 694–719. arXiv:q-bio/0610048. doi:10.1137/060673254. S2CID 14655317. Retrieved June 9, 2008.
  19. Ahmed, S.; Karsiti, M.N. (2007), "A testbed for control schemes using multi agent nonholonomic robots", 2007 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology, p. 459, doi:10.1109/EIT.2007.4374547, ISBN 978-1-4244-0940-2, S2CID 2734931
  20. Yang, Lidong; Li, Zhang (2021). "Motion control in magnetic microrobotics: From individual and multiple robots to swarms". Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems. 4: 509–534. doi:10.1146/annurev-control-032720-104318. S2CID 228892228.
  21. Pinan Basualdo, Franco; Misra, Sarthak (2023). "Collaborative Magnetic Agents for 3D Microrobotic Grasping". Advanced Intelligent Systems. 5 (12). doi:10.1002/aisy.202300365. S2CID 262167298.
  22. Ahmed, Salman; Karsiti, Mohd N.; Agustiawan, Herman (2007). "A development framework for collaborative robots using feedback control". Retrieved January 8, 2024.
  23. "IEEE IES Technical Committee on Industrial Agents (TC-IA)". tcia.ieee-ies.org. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  24. Leitão, Paulo; Karnouskos, Stamatis (March 26, 2015). Industrial agents : emerging applications of software agents in industry. Leitão, Paulo,, Karnouskos, Stamatis. Amsterdam, Netherlands. ISBN 978-0128003411. OCLC 905853947.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  25. "Film showcase". MASSIVE. Retrieved April 28, 2012.
  26. Leitao, Paulo; Karnouskos, Stamatis; Ribeiro, Luis; Lee, Jay; Strasser, Thomas; Colombo, Armando W. (2016). "Smart Agents in Industrial Cyber–Physical Systems". Proceedings of the IEEE. 104 (5): 1086–1101. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2016.2521931. hdl:10198/15438. ISSN 0018-9219. S2CID 579475.
  27. Xiao-Feng Xie, S. Smith, G. Barlow. Schedule-driven coordination for real-time traffic network control. International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), São Paulo, Brazil, 2012: 323–331.
  28. Máhr, T. S.; Srour, J.; De Weerdt, M.; Zuidwijk, R. (2010). "Can agents measure up? A comparative study of an agent-based and on-line optimization approach for a drayage problem with uncertainty". Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 18: 99–119. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.153.770. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2009.04.018.
  29. Kazemi, Hamidreza; Liasi, Sahand; Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammadkazem (November 2018). "Generation Expansion Planning Considering Investment Dynamic of Market Participants Using Multi-agent System". 2018 Smart Grid Conference (SGC). pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/SGC.2018.8777904. ISBN 978-1-7281-1138-4. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
  30. Singh, Vijay; Samuel, Paulson (June 6, 2017). "Distributed Multi -Agent System Based Load Frequency Control for Multi- Area Power System in Smart Grid". IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 64 (6): 5151–5160. doi:10.1109/TIE.2017.2668983. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
  31. Gong, Xiaoqian; Herty, Michael; Piccoli, Benedetto; Visconti, Giuseppe (May 3, 2023). "Crowd Dynamics: Modeling and Control of Multiagent Systems". Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems. 6 (1): 261–282. doi:10.1146/annurev-control-060822-123629. ISSN 2573-5144.
  32. Hallerbach, S.; Xia, Y.; Eberle, U.; Koester, F. (2018). "Simulation-Based Identification of Critical Scenarios for Cooperative and Automated Vehicles". SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles. 1 (2). SAE International: 93. doi:10.4271/2018-01-1066.
  33. Madrigal, Story by Alexis C. "Inside Waymo's Secret World for Training Self-Driving Cars". The Atlantic. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  34. Connors, J.; Graham, S.; Mailloux, L. (2018). "Cyber Synthetic Modeling for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Applications". In International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security. Academic Conferences International Limited: 594-XI.

Further reading


Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Multi-agent_systems, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.