Journal_of_Accounting_Research

<i>Journal of Accounting Research</i>

Journal of Accounting Research

Journal account


The Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) is a leading peer-reviewed academic journal associated with the University of Chicago. It was established in 1963 and is published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the Chookaszian Accounting Research Center (Formerly the Institute of Professional Accounting) at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

Quick Facts Discipline, Language ...

JAR publishes original research in all areas of accounting and topics including finance, economics, statistics, psychology, and sociology. Research typically uses analytical, empirical archival, experimental, or field study methods. Questions pertain to information and measurement used in organizations, markets, governments, regulation and standards; often arising in financial reporting, disclosure, internal accounting, auditing, taxation, corporate governance, capital markets, law, contracting, and with respect to the accounting profession.

Its current senior editors are Philip G. Berger, Luzi Hail, Christian Leuz, Valeri Nikolaev, Haresh Sapra, Rodrigo Verdi, and Regina Wittenberg Moerman. The editorial manager is Lisa M. Heiberger.

It is listed as one of the 50 journals used by the Financial Times to compile its business-school research ranks[1] and Bloomberg Businessweek's Top 20 Journals.[2] According to the Journal Citation Reports, it has a 2022 impact factor of 4.4, ranking it 28 out of 111 journals in the category "Business, Finance".[3]

Alleged research misconduct

Non-academically-employed and non-peer-review published "researcher" Stephen Walker critiqued a 2020 JAR article,[4] which resulted in JAR publishing a 2022 "Erratum."[5] Walker characterized the "Erratum" as a mischaracterization of the original research, alleged it contained a falsehood, and called for a misconduct investigation.[6] The University of Melbourne's Ian D. Gow published the paper "Should Bao et al. (2020) be retracted?" in 2022,[7] followed up by another paper where he called the "Erratum"'s explanation less than plausible, said it was belied by the original paper, and claimed it failed to account for the "claimed error."[8] Overall, Gow argued that a "retract and republish" approach may have been superior to an "erratum" approach in order to most clearly correct the record from the original paper. JAR performed an extensive investigation and shared its findings with Walker in a 2023 document created as a result of Walker's request for the misconduct investigation, but did not publish the document.[9]

Former Editors


References

  1. "45 Journals used in FT Research Rank". FT.com/UK. Financial Times. 2009-02-17. Retrieved 2011-05-06.
  2. "Full-Time MBA Rankings". Bloomberg BusinessWeek. 2008-11-13. Archived from the original on December 11, 2008. Retrieved 2011-05-06.
  3. "Journals Ranked by Impact: Business, Finance". 2018 Journal Citation Reports (Science ed.). Thomson Reuters. 2013. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  4. "Erratum". Journal of Accounting Research. 60 (4): 1635–1646. 2022. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.12454.
  5. Daniel B. Klein (September 2023). "Journal of Accounting Research's Report on Its Own Research- Misconduct Investigation of an Article It Published" (PDF). Econ Journal Watch. 20 (2): 460. ISSN 1933-527X. Retrieved 27 October 2023. a document by Journal of Accounting Research (JAR). The document presents itself as a report on its own research-misconduct investigation [...] it is not published, and because the first one to publish it ought to be JAR itself



Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Journal_of_Accounting_Research, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.