Irreligion_in_Uruguay

Irreligion in Uruguay

Irreligion in Uruguay

Add article description


According to public opinion polls, irreligion in Uruguay ranges from 30[3] to 40[4] to over 47 percent of the population. Uruguay has been the least-religious country in South America due to nineteenth-century political events influenced by positivism, secularism, and other beliefs held by intellectual Europeans.[5] The resistance of the indigenous population to evangelization, which prevented the establishment of religion during the colonial era, has also been influential. According to Nestor DaCosta (2003), irreligion has historically been a feature of Uruguayan identity.[full citation needed]

Religion in Uruguay (2021)[1][2]

  Deist (30.1%)
  Atheist or Agnostic (14.4%)
  Catholic (44.8%)
  Other Christian (9.5%)
  Other/Unspecified (1.2%)

Atheism and agnosticism have grown significantly. Non-believers are a statistical minority but have been present for more than a century. Some investigations present that in recent times, secularism and non-religious beliefs have grown in the religious landscape of Uruguay due to the influence of postmodernism, as in Western Europe. Some experts argue that the number of non-religious people has stagnated, but believers in non-Christian faiths have been growing in numbers in recent decades (Conwell Investigation, 2013).[full citation needed]

Jason Mandryk said that secularism has slowly become less influential because of an increased interest in spirituality and a revival into Christianity,[6] and young people are less anti-Catholic than previous generations.

Uruguay is still a secular nation socially, but the number of places of worship is increasing. Although public life is still secular, private life has become more religious.[7]

Secularism

During the Spanish colonial period, the Catholic Church had less influence in Uruguay than in other Hispanic regions because of the relatively-small number of indigenous peoples. Catholicism was easily introduced to Spaniards and mestizos and, until the first half of the nineteenth century, the church regulated the state, a number of institutions, and land as it did in other Latin American countries.[8] According to some historians, the Uruguayan dioceses were South America's least powerful; Spanish and Italian priests, less able to teaching religion, preferred to evangelize the rural poor. When Uruguay became a secular republic in 1917, the country began to receive Spanish, Italian, and French immigrants. French immigrants in Uruguay were traditionally anti-clerical; many Spanish and Italians immigrants arrived as Catholics, but became independent of religion because of little ecclesiastical influence.

Independent of Spain and the Empire of Brazil, many educated Uruguayans were influenced by skeptical European writers and ancient Greek philosophy. After independence, cultured Uruguayans began espousing secular and humanist political views against the Catholic Church and the small (but growing) number of Afro-Brazilian religious practitioners. Control of Uruguay's cemeteries passed to the state in 1861, ending mandatory religious funerals.[9] The Colorado Party dominated the government during the mid-1860s, with secular reforms which included civil marriage and the development of technology and urban areas. Many people with little knowledge of Catholicism became irreligious due to ignorance rather than disbelief.

In 1877, José Pedro Varela advocated secular education in Uruguay. Although Catholic leaders opposed state schools, the educated elite supported the concept of secular schools which taught science. A decade later, Archbishop Mariano Soler championed Catholic education.[10]

Secularism waned for about a decade during the early 1890s. José Batlle y Ordóñez revived the movement early in the 20th century, allowing women to divorce and banning religious symbols from children's hospitals. "Batllism" enacted total separation of church and state in 1917, when Uruguay became a republic with a secular constitution and Marxist-inspired economic reforms. After the Battlist period (1903–1931), the church focused on educating Catholics and providing a Christian spiritual refuge to all citizens. The Colorado Party's influence was declining, and it was defeated by the National Party in the 1958 election.[11]

By year

More information Year, % Unaffiliated ...

By 1900, about ten percent of the world's nonreligious people lived in Uruguay.[14] According to Latinobarómetro, the number of irreligious Uruguayans increased from 18 percent in 1995 to 38 percent in 2013.[full citation needed]

According to the Pew Research Center's Religion and Public Life Project, Uruguay's nonreligious population will be 42.1 percent by 2050. The irreligious fertility rate is virtually identical to the Christian one, with Christian and nonreligious women giving birth to an average of two children from 2010 to 2015.[15]


References

  1. "Encuesta Continua de Hogares (ECH) - Instituto Nacional de Estadística".
  2. "Christianity in its Global Context, 1970–2020 (P.60)" (PDF). Gordon Conwell PDF. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 September 2018. Retrieved 2 September 2020.
  3. "Flash 6_ Religion" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2006. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
  4. Kurian, George; Mark, Lamport (7 May 2015). Encyclopedia of Christian Education, Volume 3. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 1334. ISBN 978-0-8108-8493-9.
  5. Phil Zuckerman (30 October 2006). The Cambridge Companion to Atheism – Michael Martin – Google Books. ISBN 9781139827393. Retrieved 15 July 2012.
  6. "Religion in Uruguay". Country Studies.
  7. Armet, Stephen. "Explaining How Uruguay Became a 'Religious Ghetto'" (PDF). ResearchGate.
  8. Jermyn, Leslie; Wong, Winnie (2010). Uruguay – Leslie Jermyn, Winnie Wong – Google Books. ISBN 9780761444824. Retrieved 15 July 2012.
  9. "Religion in Latin America". Pew Research Center. 13 November 2014.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Irreligion_in_Uruguay, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.