Airmont_microarchitecture

Silvermont

Silvermont

Microarchitecture from Intel


Silvermont is a microarchitecture for low-power Atom, Celeron and Pentium branded processors used in systems on a chip (SoCs) made by Intel. Silvermont forms the basis for a total of four SoC families:[1]

  • Merrifield and Moorefield   consumer SoCs intended for smartphones
  • Bay Trail  consumer SoCs aimed at tablets, hybrid devices, netbooks, nettops, and embedded/automotive systems
  • Avoton  SoCs for micro-servers and storage devices
  • Rangeley  SoCs targeting network and communication infrastructure.
Quick Facts General information, Launched ...

Silvermont is the successor of the Bonnell, using a newer 22 nm process (previously introduced with Ivy Bridge) and a new microarchitecture, replacing Hyper Threading with out-of-order execution.[2]

Silvermont was announced to news media on May 6, 2013, at Intel's headquarters at Santa Clara, California.[3] Intel had repeatedly said the first Bay Trail devices would be available during the Holiday 2013 timeframe, while leaked slides showed that the release window for Bay Trail-T as August 28 – September 13, 2013.[4] Both Avoton and Rangeley were announced as being available in the second half of 2013. The first Merrifield devices were announced in 1H14.[5]

According to the Tick–tock model Airmont is the 14 nm die shrink of Silvermont, launched in early 2015 and first seen in the Atom x7-Z8700 as used in the Microsoft Surface 3.[6] Airmont microarchitecture includes the following SoC families:[7]

  • Braswell   consumer SoCs aimed at PCs
  • Cherry Trail   consumer SoCs aimed at tablets.

Silvermont based cores have also been used, modified, in the Knight's Landing iteration of Intel's Xeon Phi HPC chips.

Design

Silvermont was the first Atom processor to feature an out-of-order architecture.[8]

Technology

Errata

Intel revealed in its Q4 2016 quarterly report that there were quality issues in the C2000 product family, which had an effect on the financial performance of the company's Data Center Group that quarter.[12] An erratum named AVR54 published by Intel; state there is a defect in the chip's LPC clock, and affected systems "may experience inability to boot or may cease operation".[13][14][15] A workaround is available requiring platform hardware changes. The SoC failures are thought to have led to failures in Cisco and Synology products,[16] though discussion of the C2000 as the root cause of failure has been reported to be under a non-disclosure agreement for many vendors.[17]

Intel released a new C0 stepping of the C2000 series in April 2017 which corrected the bug.[18]

In July 2017 Intel published that a similar quality issue affects also Atom E3800 series embedded processors. The erratum named VLI89 published by Intel state, similar to issue with Atom C2000, that there is a defect in the chip's LPC clock and affected systems "may experience inability to boot or may cease operation".[19] Issues extend also to USB bus and SD card circuitry and should happen "under certain conditions where activity is high for several years". In April 2018 Intel announced it is releasing a new D1 stepping to fix the issue.[20]

The LPC, USB and SD Card buses circuitry degradation issues also apply to other Bay Trail processors such as Intel Celeron J1900 and N2800/N2900 series;[21] also to Pentium N3500, J2850, J2900 series; and Celeron J1800 and J1750 series—as those are based on the same affected silicon.

Cisco stated failures of Atom C2000 processors can occur as early as 18 months of use with higher failure rates occurring after 36 months.[22]

Mitigations were found to limit impact on systems. Firmware update for the LPC bus called LPC_CLKRUN# reduces the utilization of the LPC interface what in turn decreases (but not eliminates) LPC bus degradation - some systems are however not compatible with this new firmware. USB should have a maximum of 10% active time and there is a 50TB transmit traffic life expectancy over the lifetime of the port. It is recommended not to use SD card as a boot device and to remove the card from the system when not in use.

Bay Trail issues on Linux

It has been widely reported that Bay Trail CPUs (and possibly their derivatives including Airmont/Braswell/Cherry Trail) experience random freezes / lock-ups on various Linux kernels. Reference Linux bug report 109051 on Kernel.org Bugzilla, first reported Dec-2015. Workaround seems to be setting the Linux kernel flag intel_idle.max_cstate=1, which while eliminating the system freezes/lock-ups, results in increased CPU power/battery usage by preventing the CPU from entering higher power-saving C-states. Systems running Windows-OSes apparently do not experience these lockup/freeze issues.

Bay Trail issues on FreeBSD

A potential fix is to set hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1 and dev.cpu.<n>.lowest via /etc/sysctl.conf.

Airmont issues

14 nm Airmont architecture processors are also affected by the design flaws as noted in the Braswell Specification Update under CHP49 errata.[23] In addition to LPC and SD Card circuitry degradation issues those 14 nm designs also have issues with Real Time Clock (RTC) circuitry degradation, their USB buses are however not affected. Unspecified firmware changes are required to mitigate RTC circuitry degradation. Intel does not plan to release a new stepping for Braswell. Intel admitted the issue stating the impact on consumers depends on use condition.[24]

List of Silvermont processors

Desktop processors (Bay Trail-D)

List of desktop processors as follows:

More information Target segment, Cores (threads) ...

Server processors (Avoton)

It has been found that a bug in the blueprint of the C2000 CPUs family may cause failure of its embedded Ethernet ports.[citation needed]

List of server processors as follows:[25]

More information Target segment, Cores (threads) ...

Communications processors (Rangeley)

List of communications processors as follows:[26]

More information Target segment, Cores (threads) ...

Embedded/automotive processors (Bay Trail-I)

List of embedded processors as follows:[27]

More information Target segment, Cores (threads) ...

Mobile processors (Bay Trail-M)

List of mobile processors as follows:

More information Target segment, Cores (threads) ...

Tablet processors (Bay Trail-T)

List of tablet and hybrid processors as follows:

More information Target segment, Cores (threads) ...

Smartphone processors (Merrifield)

List of smartphone processors as follows:

More information Model, sSpec number ...

Smartphone processors (Moorefield)

List of smartphone processors as follows:

More information Model, sSpec number ...

List of Airmont processors

Desktop processors (Braswell)

List of desktop processors as follows:

More information Target segment, Cores (threads) ...

Mobile processors (Braswell)

List of mobile processors as follows:

More information Target segment, Cores (threads) ...
  1. Some initial reports stated that the processor has 1 MB L2 cache; see Anthony Shvets. "Notes below Specifications". CPU World.
  2. Klaus Hinum (January 26, 2016). "Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)". Notebookcheck Publishing GmbH.

Tablet processors (Cherry Trail)

List of smartphone and tablet processors as follows:

More information Target segment, Cores (threads) ...

Other uses

Silvermont based processor cores have been used in Knights Landing versions of Intel's Xeon Phi multiprocessor HPC chips, with changes for HPC including AVX-512 vector units.[29][30]

See also


References

  1. "Deep inside Intel's new ARM killer: Silvermont". The Register. 2013-05-08. Retrieved 2014-04-08.
  2. "Intel Launches Low-Power, High-Performance Silvermont Microarchitecture". Newsroom.intel.com. 2013-05-06. Retrieved 2014-04-08.
  3. "Intel reveals Merrifield processor". engadget.com. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  4. Joel Hruska (March 31, 2015). "Intel quietly launches 14nm Braswell, Bay Trail's successor". ExtremeTech.
  5. Michael Kan. "Intel plans new 'Braswell' chip for PCs, over 20 Chromebooks". PCWorld. Retrieved 2014-04-08.
  6. "OpenGL ES Conformant product list". Khronos Group. 11 January 2014. Retrieved 11 January 2014.
  7. Alcorn, Paul (31 January 2017). "CPU Failures Hurt Intel's Bottom Line". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  8. Hellstrom, Jeremy (7 February 2017). "Intel's Atom C2xxx processors may just make like a banana and split". PC Perspective. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  9. Calburn, Thomas (6 February 2017). "Atom C2000 chips are bricking products – and it's not just Cisco hit". The Register. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  10. "Intel Atom Processor C2000 Product Family Specification Update" (PDF). Intel Atom Processor C2000 Product Family Specification Update. Intel. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  11. Kampman, Jeff (7 February 2017). "Report: Some embedded Atom CPUs can brick their host systems". Tech Report. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  12. Kennedy, Patrick (7 February 2017). "The Intel Atom C2000 Series Bug – Why It is So Quiet". ServeTheHome. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  13. Robinson, Cliff (23 April 2017). "Intel Atom C2000 C0 Stepping Fixing the AVR54 Bug". Serve the Home. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
  14. "Clock Signal Component Issue". Cisco. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  15. "Intel® Atom™ Processor for Server". Ark.intel.com. Retrieved 2014-04-08.
  16. "Intel® Atom™ Processor for Communications". Ark.intel.com. Retrieved 2014-04-08.
  17. "Products (Formerly Bay Trail)". Ark.intel.com. Retrieved 2014-04-08.
  18. Smith, Ryan (26 June 2014), "Intel's "Knights Landing" Xeon Phi Coprocessor Detailed", www.anadtech.com

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Airmont_microarchitecture, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.