2017_Turkish_constitutional_referendum

2017 Turkish constitutional referendum

2017 Turkish constitutional referendum

Add article description


A constitutional referendum was held in Turkey on 16 April 2017 on whether to approve 18 proposed amendments to the Turkish constitution that were brought forward by the governing Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP). As a result of its approval, the office of Prime Minister was abolished and the existing parliamentary system of government was replaced with an executive presidency and a presidential system.[1] The number of seats in Parliament was raised from 550 to 600, while, among a series of other proposals, the president was given more control over appointments to the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors (HSYK).[2][3] The referendum was held under a state of emergency that was declared following the failed military coup attempt in July 2016.

Quick Facts Results, Choice ...

Early results indicated a 51–49% lead for the "Yes" vote. In an unprecedented move, the Supreme Electoral Council (YSK) allowed non-stamped ballots to be accepted as valid. Some critics of the reform decried this move to be illegal, claiming that as many as 1.5 million ballots were unstamped, and did not recognize the results.[4] Large-scale protests erupted following the results in order to protest the YSK's decision.[5] In subsequent reports, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) both criticized unfairness during the campaign and declared the YSK's decision to be illegal.[6][7]

An executive presidency was a long-standing proposal of the governing AKP and its founder, the current President of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. In October 2016, the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) announced its co-operation for producing draft proposals with the government, with the combined support of both AKP and MHP MPs being sufficient to put forward the proposals to a referendum following a parliamentary vote in January. Those in favour of a "Yes" vote argued that the changes were necessary for a strong and stable Turkey, arguing that an executive presidency would bring about an end to unstable coalition governments that had dominated Turkish politics since the 1960s up until 2002. The "No" campaign have argued that the proposals would concentrate too much power in the hands of the President, effectively dismantling the separation of powers and taking legislative authority away from Parliament. Three days before the referendum, one of Erdoğan's aides called for a federal system should the "Yes" vote prevail, causing a backlash from the pro-Yes MHP.[8] Both sides of the campaign have been accused of using divisive and extreme rhetoric, with Erdoğan accusing all "No" voters of being terrorists siding with the plotters of the failed 2016 coup.[9]

The campaign was marred by allegations of state suppression against "No" campaigners, while the "Yes" campaign was able to make use of state facilities and funding to organize rallies and campaign events.[10] Leading members of the "No" campaign, which included many high-profile former members of the MHP such as Meral Akşener, Ümit Özdağ, Sinan Oğan, and Yusuf Halaçoğlu were all subject to both violence and campaign restrictions. The "Yes" campaign was faced with campaigning restrictions by several European countries, with the German, Dutch, Danish and Swiss governments all cancelling or requesting the suspension of "Yes" campaign events directed at Turkish voters living abroad. The restrictions caused a sharp deterioration in diplomatic relations and caused a diplomatic crisis between Turkey and the Netherlands. Concerns were also raised about voting irregularities, with "Yes" voters in Germany being caught attempting to vote more than once and also being found to have been in possession of ballot papers before the overseas voting process had started.[11][12] European election monitors said the vote did not meet international standards.[13]

Background

A ballot paper and envelope used in the referendum. 'Evet' translates to Yes while 'Hayır' translates to No.

Introducing a presidential system was proposed by then-Minister of Justice Cemil Çiçek and backed by then-Prime Minister Erdoğan in 2005.[14] Since then, the current presidential system has been openly supported by Justice and Development Party leaders several times, along with a "new constitution". Justice and Development Party vice-president Hayati Yazıcı proposed April 2017 as a date for the referendum.[15]

The parliamentary system formally began transforming into a centralised presidential system after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan won the July 2018 elections. Since its inception, there have been competing arguments for and against this transformation.[16]

Constitutional amendments

Initial proposals

On 10 December 2016, the AKP and MHP brought forward a total of 21 proposed amendments to the constitution and began collecting signatures from MPs in order to begin the parliamentary procedures for initiating a referendum. After Assembly Commission talks, 3 proposals were withdrawn, leaving 18 amendments remaining. The full-text proposal in Turkish and the present Turkish constitution are found at the following links.[17][18] The most important changes have been highlighted by the Union of Turkish Bar Associations.[19]

An English-language summary and interpretation of the 18 amendments is listed in the table below.[20][21]

More information Description of proposed amendments, Proposal # ...
Notes
  1. This increment ratio is defined by Ministry of Finance and determines changes on absolute-valued taxes and fines.

Parliamentary Constitutional Commission

The AKP presenting their constitutional proposals to Parliament Speaker İsmail Kahraman, December 2016
The Parliamentary Constitutional Commission scrutinising the proposed changes

After being signed by the AKP's 316 MPs, the 21 proposed changes were submitted to the Speaker of the Grand National Assembly and were then referred to the Parliamentary Constitutional Commission.[22] The Parliamentary Constitutional Commission, headed by AKP MP Mustafa Şentop, began scrutinizing the proposals in December 2016, earlier than the planned date of January 2017. The Constitutional Commission is formed of 25 Members of which 15 are from the AKP, 5 are from the CHP, 3 are from the HDP and 2 are from the MHP, as per the composition of parliament. Since the AKP held a large majority of the commission's seats, it was expected by media commentators that there would be minimal surprise developments at the scrutiny stage.[23] Debates in the commission were heated, with occasional fights being observed between MPs.[24]

The Constitutional Commission has the power to amend or reject the proposed changes before they are put to a vote for all MPs. The Commission made minor changes to numerous proposals, such as raising the number of members of the Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors from 12 to 13.[25] The commission rejected three of the 21 proposed changes, reducing the constitutional package from 21 proposals to 18. The 5th proposal, which created 'reserve MPs' to take the parliamentary seats that fall vacant between elections, was controversially rejected with just three signatures, well short of the support of 25 commission members or 184 total MPs necessary.[26] It was reported that AKP MPs opposed the creation of 'reserve MPs' on the grounds that it threatened the security of sitting MPs by incentivizing reserves to incapacitate them in order to take their seat.[27] The 15th proposal, giving the President the right to structure the civil service and state institutions through executive decrees, was rejected.[28] A day later on 29 December, the 14th proposal, which gave the right for the President to appoint senior bureaucratic officials, was also rejected.

The Commission completed the approval process on 30 December, rejecting 3 of the 21 proposals in total.[29]

More information Parliamentary Constitutional Commission scrutiny process results, Proposal ...

Parliamentary voting

MPs voting on the proposed amendments, January 2017

Following the completion of the Constitutional Commission hearings, the 18 proposals were presented to parliament for ratification. Constitutional amendments need a three fifths majority (330 votes) to be put forward to a referendum and a two-thirds majority (367 votes) to be ratified directly. Justice and Development Party (AK Party) officials claimed before the vote that even if the 367-threshold was reached, the government would not ratify the changes without a referendum.[30]

Parliament voted on each of the 18 proposals separately in two rounds. The first round served as an indicator of whether the amendments would gather sufficient support, with amendments being proposed by all parties present in the chamber. In the second round, parties are no longer permitted to propose changes to the proposals. The results of the second round are taken into account, with 330 votes needed to send them to a referendum or 367 for direct implementation. A final vote on all of the approved proposals at large, with the same thresholds, was undertaken at the end of the second round, with the entire process being disbanded if votes in favour fell below 330.[31]

Of the total 550 Members of Parliament, 537 were entitled to a vote. 11 MPs from the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) were under arrest for terrorism charges and were unable to partake in the vote, with the remaining 48 HDP MPs boycotting the vote after their motion calling for the arrested MPs to be brought to parliament to vote was rejected.[32] The Parliamentary Speaker İsmail Kahraman, who is unable to take part in the vote by virtue of being the Speaker, was hospitalized during the vote, meaning that AK Party deputy speaker Ahmet Aydın presided over the proceedings and was therefore unable to cast a vote.[33]

Of the 537 MPs eligible to vote, the AK Party held 315, the CHP 133, the MHP 39, the HDP 48 and 2 were independent. Out of the MHP's 39 MPs, 6 had openly stated that they would vote against the amendments, leaving the total number of MPs expected to vote "Yes" at 348. The CHP's 133 MPs and the two independents, which consisted of Aylin Nazlıaka and Ümit Özdağ, voted "No" while the HDP boycotted the votes.[citation needed]

More information Theoretical distribution of votes according to party lines, Party ...

Parliamentary voting began on 9 January, with the first round of voting being completed on 15 January. Opposition politicians criticized the rushed way in which the votes were conducted, with four to five votes taking place in a day with no adjournments.[34] The votes were marred by numerous irregularities, with CHP Members of Parliament filming AK Party MPs openly casting their vote or intimidating uncertain MPs to vote "Yes".[35] The Minister of Health, Recep Akdağ, was filmed casting an open vote, which is disallowed by the constitution, and openly admitting that he had committed a crime afterwards.[36] AKP MPs responded to attempts to film them with hostility, with fights occasionally breaking out between government and opposition MPs.[37] CHP MP Fatma Kaplan Hürriyet was allegedly strangled by AKP Parliamentary Group Leader Mustafa Elitaş after she filmed Elitaş and Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım casting open votes.[38] Several MPs were hospitalized, while the podium where MPs rose to make speeches was dislocated with one of its €15,000 microphones being reported as missing.[39] The second round of voting was completed on 20 January, with all of the proposed amendments being approved. A final motion to enact the approved amendments was approved by 339 votes, surpassing the 330-vote threshold to hold a referendum but falling short of the 367-vote threshold needed to enact the amendments directly.

Article voting

More information Proposal, Issue ...

Several[clarification needed] AKP MPs voted openly for the changes, violating the constitutional requirement of a secret vote.[40]

Reception

MHP MPs Özcan Yeniçeri, Ümit Özdağ and Yusuf Halaçoğlu announcing their opposition to the proposed constitutional changes

The amendments were received with heavy criticism from opposition parties and non-governmental organisations, with criticism focusing particularly on the erosion of the separation of powers and the abolition of parliamentary accountability. Constitutional legal experts such as Kemal Gözler and İbrahim Kaboğlu claimed that the changes would result in the Parliament becoming effectively powerless, while the executive president would have controls over the executive, legislative, and judiciary.[41] On 4 December, the Atatürkist Thought Association (ADD), Association for the Support of Contemporary Living (ÇYDD) and the Trade Union Confederation held a rally in Ankara despite having their permissions revoked by the Governor of Ankara, calling for a rejection of the executive presidential system on the grounds that it threatened judicial independence and secular democratic values.[42]

The amendments were initially received with mixed responses from the opposition CHP, which have long been critical of the AKP's constitutional plans. Shortly after the proposals were made public and submitted to Parliament on 10 December, Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım reported that the CHP was in agreement with 5 of the proposed changes.[43] However, reception by the CHP was negative, with the party's deputy leader Selin Sayek Böke claiming that the proposals essentially created a "sultanate".[44] Parliamentary group leader Levent Gök, one of the first to comment on the released proposals, claimed that the changes would revert 140 years of Turkish parliamentary democracy, calling on all parties to reject the proposals.[45] Another of the CHP's parliamentary group leaders, Özgür Özel, called the proposals a "regime change", with the parliament being left essentially powerless in scrutinising ministers and holding them to account.[46] Özel claimed that the AKP were unlikely to obtain the 330 votes necessary to put the changes to a referendum, stating that he would be surprised if the number of MPs voting in favour reached 275.[47] CHP MP Selina Doğan claimed that the authoritarian nature of the proposals would effectively end Turkey's EU accession negotiations, citing the lack of any relevance to European values.[48] CHP MP Cemal Oktan Yüksel claimed that the proposals resembled the constitution of Assad's Syria, stating that it wouldn't be a national constitution but "Syria's constitution translated".[49]

Despite having the nationalist MHP's official support, it was reported that Turkish nationalists were also overwhelmingly critical of both the proposals and their party's involvement in their drafting.[50] Bahçeli, who has historically lent support to the AKP in controversial situations, was subject to criticism from all major parties for his decision to support the constitutional amendments, being described as the AKP's "back garden", "life-line" or "spare tyre" by critics.[51][52][53] On 24 October 2016, 5 of the 40 MHP Members of Parliament declared that they would reject the constitutional proposals, against their party line.[54] Ümit Özdağ, who was a leadership candidate against Bahçeli and one of the 5 MPs critical of the changes, had his party membership revoked in November.[55] A poll released by Gezici in December showed that almost two-thirds of MHP supporters were against the proposed changes, though MHP supporters were also the most undecided amongst the other parties.[56] On 27 December, MHP MP Kadir Koçdemir became the fifth MP from his party to publicly state his opposition to the proposals.[57]

Speaking shortly after the proposals were released, the HDP's spokesperson Ayhan Bilgen criticized the proposed changes for being anti-democratic and against the principle of judicial independence. Citing the proposed creation of "executive orders" that can be decreed by the President at will without parliamentary scrutiny. Bilgen criticized the nature of the changes, calling them poorly written and an attempt to cover up constitutional violations that had taken place under the current constitution.[58] However, on 18 December, HDP MP Kadri Yıldırım claimed that there would be no reason to reject the proposals if the changes included a separate "status" for Turkish Kurds and a constitutional entitlement to education for Kurdish citizens in their native Kurdish language.[59] This led to speculation that the HDP could be convinced to support the changes by the AKP government, though the MHP would be unlikely to jointly support any changes that were also endorsed by the HDP.[60] On 21 December, the CHP and HDP issued a parliamentary motion that would declare the proposals "unconstitutional", but the motion was rejected by MPs.[61]

The changes have also received severe criticism from outside Turkey. One commentator went so far as to declare that "if a majority votes yes, this will be the end of parliamentary democracy in Turkey."[62] The NGO Human Rights Watch stated that the changes were a "huge threat to human rights, the rule of law, and the country's democratic future."[63] The Economist concluded that "a vote for Yes would saddle the country with an elected dictator."[64] The Venice Commission of the Council of Europe, in its March 2017 Opinion on the Constitutional amendments, defined them as "a threat to democracy" and stressed the "dangers of degeneration of the proposed system towards and authoritarian and personal regime".[65] Also, before the vote took place, the openDemocracy website reported that some European news outlets published concerns that the 2017 referendum amounted to something like an "enabling act" for Erdoğan.[66]

Campaign positions

Ruling party AK Party and opposition MHP are the signatories of the amendments. MHP has provided their conditional support until their conditions are met.[67] Main opposition CHP's initial position was to wait until the amendments were finalized. CHP leader Kılıçdaroğlu once mentioned of bringing the changes into Grand Assembly.[68] Later, CHP decided to favor No vote and started "Türkiye'yi Böldürmeyeceğiz" (Turkish: We'll not partition Turkey) rallies. Parliament's fourth party HDP is against the changes.

Political parties

More information Choice, Party ...
More information Other parties, Choice ...

NGOs and other groups

More information NGOs and other groups, Choice ...

Campaigns

"Yes" campaign

The AK Party "Yes" campaign logo. Kararımız evet translates to 'Our decision is yes'
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan campaigning for a "Yes" vote in Kahramanmaraş, 17 February 2017

The "Yes" campaign has been predominantly led by Justice and Development Party (AK Party) politicians, as well as Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) politicians loyal to leader Devlet Bahçeli. Initially expecting a 7 February start to the campaign, the AKP eventually kicked off their official campaign on 25 February with a presentation by Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım at the Ankara sports stadium. Amid poor showings in opinion polls in February, Erdoğan reportedly asked pro-government pollsters to suspend their opinion polling until the end of March, while proposals for a joint electoral rally by both leading AK Party and MHP politicians has also been proposed.[151]

The "Yes" campaign has been criticized for its smear campaign against individuals voting "No", associating them with numerous terrorist organisations. Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım claimed that they would vote "Yes" because the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and the so-called Fethullah Gülen Terrorist Organisation (FETO) were voting "No", though both organisations have historically been in favour of an executive presidency.[152] President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan also caused controversy when he claimed that those voting "No" were siding with the coup plotters behind the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt.[153]

At present, the "Yes" campaign has been conducted through electoral rallies held by Prime Minister Yıldırım, leading AK Party politicians and also President Erdoğan, who has held 'public opening' rallies similar to his tactics in the June 2015 general election.[154] MHP leader Devlet Bahçeli has conducted conferences in favour of a "Yes" vote, with the first occurring in Konya on 12 February 2017.[155]

On 10 March, the Great Union Party (BBP) led by Mustafa Destici announced that they would support a "Yes" vote, bringing the total number of parties supporting "Yes" to six.[156] Both the BBP and MHP have suffered serious opposition to their support for a "Yes" vote, with BBP members calling for Destici's resignation following his announcement.[157] The MHP suffered a wave of resignations, inner-party suspensions and a rival "No" campaign run by high-profile nationalist politicians, with opinion polls indicating that a significant majority of MHP voters intend to vote against the proposals.[158][159][160] Most polls put the percentage of "No" voters in the MHP at between 50% and 80%, with definite "Yes" voters remaining at 20-25%.[161][162] Politicians supporting "No" from both the MHP and BBP have claimed that over 95% of their party supporters are favouring a "No" vote, breaking with their party's executive decision.[163][164]

More information Party, Leader ...

"No" campaign

CHP leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu addressing a "No" rally in Diyarbakır

The CHP unveiled their campaign logo and slogan on 28 February, using the slogan 'Geleceğim için Hayır' (translating to For my future, no). The party planned their first electoral rally in Amasya, though preliminary rallies were held by party leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu on 21 December 2016 in Adana and by dissident MP Muharrem İnce on 8 March 2017 at Zonguldak. CHP MPs also made a series of overseas visits to rally support from overseas voters, with former leader Deniz Baykal holding an event in France.[165]

High-profile dissident MHP politicians, such as Meral Akşener, Sinan Oğan, Ümit Özdağ, and Yusuf Halaçoğlu all began a "No" campaign based on Turkish nationalism, rivalling the MHP's official "Yes" campaign. The dissident "No" campaign attracted significantly higher popularity than the MHP's official "Yes" events, with opinion polls indicating that an overwhelming majority of MHP voters intend to break the party line and vote "No". In addition to the MHP dissidents, the Turkish Bars Association and its President Metin Feyzioğlu and Leader of "No" Party Leader Tuna Bekleviç[166][167][168][169] embarked on a nationwide tour, intending to meet with locals in numerous towns and villages to rally support for a "No" vote.[170]

"No" campaigners have faced alleged government-backed coercion and suppression. On 1 March, the main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) unveiled a 78-point report regarding irregularities and suppression of "No" campaigners, with Deputy Leader Öztürk Yılmaz claiming that those who were campaigning for a "No" vote faced fear and state coercion.[171][172] CHP parliamentary group leader Engin Altay also criticized the government for using state funds to fund the "Yes" campaign while repressing "No" voters, claiming that their conduct did not allow them to talk of 'democracy'.[173]

More information Party, Leader ...

Controversies and electoral misconduct

Allegations of electoral misconduct, irregularities throughout the campaign and state coercion of "No" supporters were widespread prior to, during and after the referendum. European election monitors said the referendum did not meet international standards.[13]

State suppression of "No" voters

The AKP government and the General Directorate of Security (police) have both been criticized for employing tactics designed to limit the campaigning abilities of "No" supporters, through arrests, control of the media and political suppression. On 23 January 2017, university students campaigning for a "No" vote on a commuter ferry in Istanbul were implicated by security officers for 'insulting the president', with their arrests being stopped by onboard passengers.[174] On 31 January, Republican People's Party council member Sera Kadıgil was arrested and later freed on charges of 'insulting religious values and inciting hatred' for campaigning for a "No" vote on social media.[175] In Bursa, a voter who revealed that he was voting "No" was reported to the police and later arrested.[176] National television channels have been vastly in favour of the "Yes" campaign. One study found that "Yes" supporters received 90% of airtime.[64] A Turkish court banned a pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) song Bejin Na (Say No) which supported the "No" on the grounds that it contravened the constitution and fomented hatred.[177][178]

Municipalities held by pro-"Yes" parties have also sought to limit the campaign events of "No" voters by denying them rights to hold rallies in public spaces of community halls. Meral Akşener, a leading nationalist politician and one of the most prominent campaigners for a "No" vote, was stopped from holding speeches when her campaign venues in Yalova and Edirne were abruptly shut down shortly before her events, with posters advertising her events in Eskişehir being ripped down.[179][180] On 11 February while she was making a speech at a hotel hall in Çanakkale, the venue suffered a power cut and was perceived by the pro-opposition media to be a symbol of the oppressive tactics against the "No" campaign. After initially being obstructed by riot police, attendees at the conference used their phone lights to allow the event to continue.[181][182][183]

Overseas "Yes" campaign bans

Overseas election campaigning, even in diplomatic missions, is illegal under Turkish law.[184][185] Yet, most political parties in Turkey, including CHP and the ruling AKP, have broken the law.[how?][184][185]

Foreign minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu making a statement following the cancellation of campaign events in Germany

In early March, pro-"Yes" campaigners, including high-profile AKP government ministers were barred from holding campaign events in Germany, France, Austria, Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, and the Netherlands.[186]

Germany

In Germany, local municipalities withdrew permits for Justice Minister Bekir Bozdağ's campaign event in Gaggenau and Economy Minister Nihat Zeybekçi's event in Cologne.[187] While authorities cited security concerns, the insufficient capacities of the rented venues and irregularities in the organisational process, the Turkish government strongly condemned the cancellations and claimed that they were directly linked to an anti-Turkish agenda of the German federal government.[188] Turkish foreign minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu claimed that Germany had showed 'double standards' and a disregard for 'human rights and freedom of speech' by cancelling the events. Following a negative reaction by the German federal government to a proposed rally by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Erdoğan accused Germany of 'Nazi-style tactics', causing strong condemnation by German officials and a souring of diplomatic relations.[189] The Turkish government also accused Germany of funding and supporting the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which is designated as a terrorist organisation in both countries.[190] Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu was due to meet his German counterpart on 8 March, with scheduled campaign speeches in Hamburg also being cancelled due to irregularities with the venues. Çavuşoğlu therefore made his speech in the Hamburg consulate, despite Turkish law forbidding election campaigns in diplomatic missions.[191] The cancellations in Germany were met by condemnation from the main opposition and pro-"No" Republican People's Party, with former leader Deniz Baykal cancelling a planned visit to Germany as a result.[192]

Diplomatic crisis with the Netherlands

Pro-"Yes" protests outside the Dutch embassy in Turkey following the Dutch–Turkish diplomatic crisis

A diplomatic crisis occurred between Turkey and the Netherlands on 11 March, after Çavuşoğlu's official plane had its permission to land revoked mid-air ahead of a scheduled campaign speech. Later that day, Families and Social Policy Minister Fatma Betül Sayan Kaya's convoy was stopped by Dutch police, which blocked her access to the Turkish consulate in Rotterdam. Kaya was later declared persona non grata, with a regional state of emergency being declared and her convoy being asked to leave the country. Kaya was therefore forced to return to Germany, while Çavuşoğlu left for France to attend another campaign event. Violent protests by Turkish expats broke out in Rotterdam following the expulsion of both ministers, with the police making 12 arrests.[193]

The Dutch government had previously asked Turkish ministers to refrain from campaigning in the country, fearing that divisive campaign rhetoric would sow divisions within the Turkish community.[194] Prime Minister Mark Rutte claimed that negotiations with the Turkish government to allow a small scale speech by the minister were still ongoing, when Çavuşoğlu publicly threatened with sanctions should ministers be prevented from campaigning. It was these threats that made the situation unsolvable to the Dutch government.[195]

Many people in Turkey took the side of the Turkish government in the matter, with the pro-"No" main opposition announcing their support for the government and calling on the AKP to freeze diplomatic relations with the Netherlands.[196] All CHP overseas campaign events were later suspended in solidarity, while the pro-"No" MHP dissident camp also expressed their condemnation against the Dutch government for their actions.[197][193][198] In the Dutch parliament all parties, except for the two-seat Denk party, supported the decisions of the Dutch Government. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan reiterated his claim that European governments that suspended campaigning were 'Nazi remnants', which the Dutch government denounced as "unacceptable".[199]

Unstamped ballots

On the referendum day, while the voting was underway, the Supreme Electoral Council of Turkey lifted a rule that required each ballot to have an official stamp. Instead, it ruled that ballots with no stamp would be considered valid, unless there was proof that they were fraudulent. Some claim that because ballots had not only stamps but other security measures [which?] in place, it doesn't make them illegitimate, but no proof whatsoever had been presented for this.[200] The Supreme Electoral Council filed a criminal complaint for the officials that caused the problem by not stamping the ballots.[201] The opposition parties claim that as many as 2.5 million ballots without a stamp were accepted.[202] Opposition parties CHP and HDP have said they will contest the results. CHP leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu said that lifting the rule violated Turkish law.[202] According to Meral Akşener, "No" won by 52 percent.[203] The Peoples' Democratic Party contested the election results announced by pro-government Anadolu Agency and insisted that 2.5 million votes without valid stamps should be cancelled.[204]

Opinion polls

Nationwide

More information Date(s) conducted, Polling organisation/client ...

Overseas

More information Date(s) conducted, Polling organisation/client ...

Results

Overall results

More information Choice, Nationwide votes ...
Referendum results by province

Results by province

More information Province, Registered voters ...

Overseas results

More information Country, Yes ...

Reactions

Sovereign states

  •  Austria – Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz expressed his opposition to Turkey's accession to the European Union.[210]
  •  Azerbaijan – President Ilham Aliyev was the first international leader to call the Turkish President, saying that the result demonstrated "the Turkish people's great support" for Erdoğan's policy.[211]
  •  Belarus – President Alexander Lukashenko congratulated Turkey on the successful referendum.
  •  China – Chinese Deputy Prime Minister Liu Yandong, who was visiting Turkey at the time of the referendum, congratulated Erdoğan and the Turkish people on the victory.[212]
  •  Cyprus – Government spokesman Nicos Christodoulides said that Cyprus hopes Turkey's stance will move the peace talks forward toward the stated goal of reunifying the island as a federation.
  •  France – President François Hollande stated that the Turkish people have the right to decide how to organize political institutions, but the referendum results show that Turkey is divided about the reforms.[213]
  •  Georgia – Prime Minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili congratulated Turkey on the referendum results and remarked that Turkey's stable development was important to Georgia.
  •  Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel said the tight referendum result showed that Turkey is divided and reports over irregularities should be taken seriously.[213] Peter Altmaier, Merkel's chief of staff, said that Germany "would respect a result that came about in a free and democratic vote". Asked if the result was indeed free and democratic, he said he would wait for the verdict of election observers.[214]
  •  Hungary – Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán called Erdoğan to congratulate him immediately after the referendum.[215]
  •  Iran – Iranian Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, extended congratulations to his Turkish counterpart, Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu.[citation needed]
  •  Iraq – Iraqi Vice President Osama al-Nujaifi sent a message to congratulate the Turkish President.[211]
  •  Kazakhstan – President Nursultan Nazarbayev sent a telegram of congratulations to Erdoğan.
  •  Nigeria – President Muhammadu Buhari has congratulated the people and government of Turkey on the successful conclusion of the country's referendum.
  •  Pakistan – President Mamnoon Hussain and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif also congratulated the Turkish people on the victory.[216]
  •  Palestine – President Mahmoud Abbas extended congratulations to the Turkish President.[211]
  •  Qatar – Qatar's Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani also congratulated the Turkish President on victory.[211]
  •  Russia – President Vladimir Putin called the Turkish President to extend congratulations on behalf of the Russian people.[217]
  •  Saudi Arabia – Saudi Arabia's cabinet congratulated Erdoğan and the Turkish people on the successful referendum of constitutional amendments.[218]
  •  Somalia – Somali President Mohamed Farmajo has congratulated the people and government of Turkey on the successful referendum on Turkey's future [219]
  •  United States – President Donald Trump called the Turkish President to congratulate him on the victory.[220]

Regional organisations

  •  European Union – The Spokesman for European Commission President, Jean-Claude Juncker, expressed concerns over allegations of irregularities in the referendum and called on Turkish civil authorities to launch transparent investigations into the claims.[221]

See also

Notes

  1. The polling firm concluded that despite the lead of stated "Yes" votes, there were some "No" voters who claimed otherwise out of fear and a large number of "No" voters not answering at all, leading to the conclusion that "No" voters were in the lead by 51.2%)

References

  1. "Turkish parliament nears approval of presidential system sought by Erdoğan". Reuters. 19 January 2017. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
  2. "Turkish committee clears draft expanding Erdoğan's powers". 30 December 2016. Archived from the original on 11 April 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2017.
  3. "Turkey Parliament Triggers Referendum on Presidential System". Bloomberg. 22 January 2017. Archived from the original on 11 April 2017. Retrieved 2 April 2017.
  4. Sanchez, Raf; Yüksekkaş, Burhan (16 April 2017). "Erdoğan claims victory in Turkish referendum but result swiftly challenged by opposition". Telegraph.co.uk. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  5. "Birçok ilde referandum ve YSK protestosu". Gazeteduvar.com.tr. 18 April 2017. Archived from the original on 22 May 2017. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  6. "AKPM referandum raporunu açıkladı 'YSK kararı yasaya aykırı'". Habererk.com. 1 September 2017. Archived from the original on 2 June 2017. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  7. "Erdoğan'dan 'hayır' diyenlere 'terörist'ten sonra 'darbeci' sopası". Archived from the original on 3 May 2017. Retrieved 11 April 2017.
  8. "In run-up to referendum, Turks can say anything but "No"". 17 February 2017. Archived from the original on 11 April 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2017.
  9. habercisi, YARIN | Güzel günlerin. "Almanya'da referandum oylamasında hile iddiası:AKP yöneticisi seçimden önce pusulayla poz verdi". Archived from the original on 14 February 2019. Retrieved 11 April 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  10. "Milli Gazete - Almanyadaki referandum sandığında hile". Archived from the original on 11 April 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2017.
  11. Inside Turkey's Irregular Referendum Archived 28 April 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Wall Street Journal
  12. "Gündem başkanlık tartışması" (in Turkish). NTV Turkey. 3 January 2005. Archived from the original on 28 November 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2016.
  13. "AKP'den başkanlık açıklaması: Nisan ayında referanduma gidilebilir" (in Turkish). BirGün. Archived from the original on 29 October 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2016.
  14. KIRIŞCI, KEMAL; TOYGÜR, İLKE. "TURKEY'S NEW PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEM AND A CHANGING WEST: IMPLICATIONS FOR TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY AND TURKEYWEST RELATIONS" (PDF). Foreign Policy at Brookings: 1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 December 2021. Retrieved 20 March 2022.
  15. "TÜRKİYE BÜYÜK MİLLET MECLİSİ : SIRA SAYISI: 447" (PDF). Anayasadegisikligi.barobirlik.org.tr. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  16. "Anayasa Mahkemesi". Anayasa.gov.tr. Archived from the original on 17 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  17. "TBB | Anayasa Değişikliği Teklifi'nin Karşılaştırmalı ve Açıklamalı Metni". Anayasadegisikligi.barobirlik.org.tr. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  18. "21 maddelik anayasa teklifi Meclis'te: Cumhurbaşkanı yürütmenin başı". Diken. 10 December 2016. Archived from the original on 29 January 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  19. "18 maddelik anayasa değişikliği teklifinin tam metni". Evrensel.net (in Turkish). 10 January 2017. Archived from the original on 24 February 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
  20. "Yeni anayasa teklifi Meclis Başkanlığı'nda". 29 December 2016. Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 16 April 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  21. Yıldız Yazıcıoğlu Abone (26 December 2016). "TBMM Anayasa Komisyonu'nda Gerilimli Görüşme". Amerikaninsesi.com (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 14 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  22. "Anayasa Komisyonu'nda tansiyon yükseldi – Sözcü Gazetesi". Sozcu.com.tr. 24 December 2016. Archived from the original on 14 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  23. "Teklif 19 maddeye düştü: Cumhurbaşkanının 'kamu kararnamesi' yetkisi iptal". Diken (in Turkish). 28 December 2016. Archived from the original on 7 December 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
  24. "Yedek milletvekilliği iptal". NTV. 27 December 2016. Archived from the original on 14 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  25. "Anayasa değişikliği teklifi 18 maddeye düşürüldü - Politika". T24. Archived from the original on 14 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  26. "Anayasa teklifi değişti: 21 maddeden ikisi iptal". Birgun.net. Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  27. "Plans to expand the powers of Turkey's Erdoğan have passed the first hurdle". Businessinsider.com. Archived from the original on 14 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  28. "AKP, 367'den vazgeçemedi" (in Turkish). Cumhurriyet. 9 December 2016. Archived from the original on 17 April 2017. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
  29. "Anayasa değişikliği süreci nasıl işleyecek? - Konhaber - Türkiye'nin İnternet Gazetesi". Konhaber.com. Archived from the original on 14 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  30. "Tutuklu HDP vekillerinden itiraz: Anayasa görüşmeleri iç tüzüğe aykırı, durdurun - Diken". Diken.com.tr. 7 January 2017. Archived from the original on 14 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  31. "İsmail Kahraman hastaneye kaldırıldı!" (in Turkish). Cagdas Ses. 29 December 2016. Archived from the original on 17 April 2017.
  32. "Baykal'dan çok sert anayasa çıkışı". Interethaber.com. 10 January 2017. Archived from the original on 15 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  33. "CHP'li Özkan'ın oylamaya müdahale isyanı". Nediyor.com. 9 January 2017. Archived from the original on 15 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  34. "Sağlık Bakanı açık oy kullandı uyarılara sert tepki gösterdi – Sözcü Gazetesi". Sozcu.com.tr. 11 January 2017. Archived from the original on 15 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  35. "Fatma Kaplan Hürriyet bu görüntüleri çektiği için darbedildi". Evrensel.net. 12 January 2017. Archived from the original on 13 January 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  36. Hürriyet Haber (13 January 2017). "Meclis kürsüsündeki 15 bin Euro'luk mikrofon kayıp - Son Dakika Gündem Haberleri". Hurriyet.com.tr. Archived from the original on 15 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  37. "Secret ballot debate grows as charter talks proceed - POLITICS". Web.hurriyetdailynews.com. 13 September 2011. Archived from the original on 15 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  38. "HALK BAŞKANLIK SİSTEMİNE "HAYIR" DİYEREK ANITKABİR'E YÜRÜDÜ - Atatürkçü Düşünce Derneği". 29 December 2016. Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 16 April 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  39. "Başbakan Yıldırım'dan Yeni Anayasa Teklifiyle İlgili İlk Açıklama: CHP'nin de Mutabık Olduğu Maddeler Var". Marmaragazetesi.com. 10 December 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  40. "CHP'li Böke: Meclise sunulmuş olan teklif bir padişahlık teklifidir". sozcu.com.tr (in Turkish). 11 December 2016. Archived from the original on 8 December 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
  41. Nursima Keskin (10 December 2016). "CHP'den anayasa teklifine ilişkin ilk açıklama - Son Dakika Gündem Haberleri". Hurriyet.com.tr. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  42. "Cumhuriyet Gazetesi - (Video) CHP'li Özgür Özel'den başkanlık karşıtı "kefenli hodri meydan" konuşması". Cumhuriyet.com.tr. 22 December 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  43. "CHP'li Özgür Özel: 275'in üzerine çıkamazlar". Birgun.net. 10 December 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  44. "CHP'li Doğan: Anayasa teklifi yasalaşırsa AB süreci biter". Ensonhaber.com. 28 December 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  45. "Yeni Anayasa teklifi Ülkücüleri ayağa kaldırdı". Yenicaggazetesi.com.tr. 10 December 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  46. "CHP'nin 'Saray'ın yedek lastiği' sözlerine MHP'den yanıt: PKK'nın don lastiği". Diken. 14 October 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  47. "CHP'li Gök: MHP, AKP'ye can simidi olmuş - Haberler". Milliyet.com.tr. 8 March 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  48. "Ülkücüler MHP'yi AKP'nin arka bahçesi yaptırmayacak". Gazete2023.com. 16 October 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  49. "MHP'li 5 milletvekili başkanlık teklifine hayır diyecek". NTV. 24 October 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  50. "MHP'den ihraç edilen Ümit Özdağ konuştu | Gündem Haberleri". Haberturk.com. 16 November 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  51. "Yeni Anayasa anketinden çok konuşulacak sonuçlar – Sözcü Gazetesi". Sozcu.com.tr. 28 December 2016. Archived from the original on 16 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  52. "MHP'li vekil tweet attı, Anayasa hesabı karıştı! - 61 Hayat İnternet Gazetesi". 61hayat.com. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  53. "HDP'den yeni anayasa teklifi açıklaması | Gündem Haberleri". Haberturk.com. 10 December 2016. Archived from the original on 17 April 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  54. "HDP'li Yıldırım'dan başkanlık sistemi için iki şart - Cumhuriyet Siyaset Haberleri". Cumhuriyet.com.tr. 18 December 2016. Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  55. "Can Ataklı: Başkanlık sistemine HDP bombası – Sözcü Gazetesi". Archived from the original on 29 December 2016. Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  56. Gazetesi, Evrensel (22 December 2016). "AKP, anayasa değişikliği için ilk engeli atlattı". Evrensel.net (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 9 December 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
  57. "Turkey could be about to leap from division to despotism". The Guardian. 14 April 2017. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 18 April 2017. Retrieved 15 April 2017.
  58. "Turkey: President Bids for One-Man Rule". Human Rights Watch. 18 January 2017. Archived from the original on 18 April 2017. Retrieved 15 April 2017.
  59. "The Economist - World News, Politics, Economics, Business & Finance". The Economist. Archived from the original on 5 May 2007. Retrieved 15 April 2017.
  60. "Venice Commission :: Council of Europe". Archived from the original on 13 April 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2017.
  61. Düvell, Franck (28 March 2017). "Does Turkey's ongoing purge resemble the 1933 Enabling Act in Nazi Germany?". opendemocracy.net. OpenDemocracy. Archived from the original on 17 May 2017. Retrieved 17 April 2017. The constitutional reform in Turkey of 2016 and the conditions under which it is being pushed through recall legal procedures like the Enabling Act 1933 by which the Nazis came to power in Germany in the 1930s. This has been noted by many international and in particular German, Austrian and Swiss media including 'Die Tagesschau', 'Der Standard' and 'Neue Zuricher Zeitung'.
  62. "İşte MHP'nin başkanlık şartları" (in Turkish). Ulusal Kanal. Archived from the original on 29 October 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2016.
  63. "Kılıçdaroğlu, 'başkanlık' için Meclis'i bekleyecek: Hele bir gelsin görelim - Diken". Diken (in Turkish). 12 October 2016. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2016.
  64. "Hangi parti referandumda ne oy kullanacak – Sözcü Gazetesi". Sozcu.com.tr. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  65. "BBP de ayrıştı: Önce Saray'da görüşme, sonra 'hayır' açıklaması ardından yalanlama... Karar verildi". cumhuriyet.com.tr. 10 March 2017. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 10 March 2017.
  66. "Hangi parti referandumda ne oy kullanacak – Sözcü Gazetesi". Sozcu.com.tr. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  67. "Muhalif MHP'liler: Tek adama hayır". Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 20 February 2017. Retrieved 20 February 2017.
  68. "Destici'nin kararı, BBP'yi bağlamaz". Sözcü. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 10 March 2017.
  69. "Hak-Par referandum kararını açıkladı". Yonelishaber.com. Archived from the original on 22 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  70. "Bu iş Anayasa Oylaması filan değil be yahu! | Halkın Kurtuluş Partisi". Kurtuluspartisi.org. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  71. "Demokrat Parti de referandum oyunu açıkladı". Ulusalkanal.com.tr. 19 January 2017. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  72. "Başkanlık anayasasına karşı nasıl mücadele edilir?". KP.org.tr. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  73. "DSP referandumda oyunu açıkladı - CNN TÜRK - tarafsız güvenilir haberler". Cnnturk.com. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  74. "Ülkücüler 'hayır'da birleşti: "Niyet hayır, akıbet hayır!"". Yenicaggazetesi.com.tr. 18 February 2017. Archived from the original on 20 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  75. "Merkez sağ hayır diyecek". Aydınlık. 5 February 2017. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  76. "BTP'den kritik referandum açıklaması". Yenimesaj.com.tr. 2 February 2017. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  77. "Yeni anayasaya destek verdi". Yenikonya.com.tr. 18 January 2017. Archived from the original on 12 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  78. "Hüda-Par referandumda 'evet' diyeceğini açıkladı". Yenicaggazetesi.com.tr. 15 February 2017. Archived from the original on 17 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  79. "Osmanlı Parti İktidar Kongresini Yaptı". Facebook.com. 1 March 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 7 March 2017. (...) bu sisteminizin içerisine "İDAM" koyarsanız Millette gönül hoşluğu ile evet der, Osmanlı Partisi olarak biz "EKSİK" ama şartlı olarak Türk milleti ile evet diyeceğiz, ancak şartımız "Tecavüzcülere ve Vatan Hainlerine" İdamı getirmek ve "Ayasofya Camiini İbadete açmaktı" Bu şartlarımızı da kabul ederlerse bizde "Evet" deriz.
  80. "Biz Hayir'A Haziriz Ya Siz?". Tsip1974.com. Archived from the original on 12 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  81. "YETER!". TKP.org.tr. 23 January 2017. Archived from the original on 2 March 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  82. "ÖDP: 'Hayır'da umut var". Evrensel.net. 19 January 2017. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  83. "EMEP başkanlık dayatmasını protesto etti". Evrensel.net. 14 January 2017. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  84. @DSIP_ (31 January 2017). "#HAYIR! Başkanlık değil demokrasi" (Tweet) via Twitter.
  85. "TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYET'İNİN BÖLÜNMEZ... - Ayyildiz Partisi Genel Merkezi". Facebook. 25 January 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  86. "Referandumda "HAYIR"! Ya sonra? | İşçi Kardeşliği Gazetesi". Iscikardesligi.org. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  87. "DİP Merkez Komitesi'nin referandum çağrısı: Kardeş kavgası değil sınıf kavgası: sermayeye, emperyalizme ve istibdada HAYIR! | Gerçek Gazetesi". Gercekgazetesi.net (in Turkish). 7 October 2011. Archived from the original on 12 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  88. "HDP ve DBP 'hayır' kampanyası - CNN TÜRK - tarafsız güvenilir haberler". Cnnturk.com. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  89. "Tantan: Süreç, parti kavgasına dönüştü". Yenicaggazetesi.com.tr. 7 February 2017. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  90. "ESP: Tek adam diktatörlüğüne birlikte hayır diyoruz". Evrensel.net. 25 January 2017. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  91. "Bir parti daha "hayır" dedi". Odatv.com. Archived from the original on 23 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  92. "Bir sol parti daha karar verdi". Odatv.com. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  93. "Milliyetçi Türkiye Partisi shared Ahmet... - Milliyetçi Türkiye Partisi". Facebook. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  94. "ÖSP (Partiya Azadî û Sosyalîzmê) shared... - ÖSP (Partiya Azadî û Sosyalîzmê)". Facebook. 27 January 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  95. "Meclis başkanlık dayatmasını kabul etti". tkp.org. 23 January 2017. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  96. "Yeşil Sol Parti'den 'Bir Hayır Yeter' kampanyası". Evrensel.net. 4 February 2017. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  97. "TEK ADAM ANAYASASINA HAYIR !... - Türkiye Işsizler Ve Emekçiler Partisi". Facebook. 11 February 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  98. "Faşizme ve tek adam diktatörlüğüne hayır! - Sosyalist Yeniden Kuruluş Partisi". SYKP. Archived from the original on 12 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  99. "YÜCE TÜRK SOYU... Elbette #HAYIR.!!!... - TURAN Hareketi Partisi". Facebook. 3 February 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  100. "Türkiye Komünist Partisi siyasete, sokaklara, mücadeleye geri döndü!". htkp.org.tr. 25 December 2016. Archived from the original on 14 September 2017. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  101. "Cihan Partisi - Cihan Partisi shared Kürşad Emre..." Facebook. 31 January 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  102. "Security Check Required". Facebook. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  103. Oku-düşün! [@TurkiyeHalkPart] (24 January 2017). "Hayır da hayır vardır, hayırlarınız hayır olsun!" (Tweet). Retrieved 28 February 2017 via Twitter.
  104. Kaya, Ahmet (19 January 2017). "KADINLARIMIZI CANLA, BAŞLA GÖREVE DAVET EDİYORUZ..." Facebook. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  105. "As Parti Genel Başkan Açiklamalari: As Parti Yeni Yil Mesaji". Ckayikci.blogspot.com. Archived from the original on 16 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  106. "İşçi düşmanı ve baskıcı tek adam düzenine HAYIR! – İşçi Cephesi". Iscicephesi.net. 4 February 2017. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  107. "Başkanlığa Hayır Komiteleri için göreve!". tkh.org.tr. 10 January 2017. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  108. "HAYIR cephesinde birleşelim - Devrimci Parti". 11 February 2017. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  109. "Adalet Partisi referandum oyunu açıkladı". Ulusal Kanal. 3 February 2017. Archived from the original on 7 February 2017. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  110. "TC ANAYASASINA GÖRE YENİ YASANIN ANAYASA MAHKEMESİNDEN GEÇMEMESİ GEREKİYOR". Türkiye Birlik Partisi. 1 February 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
  111. "EVRENSEL YOL PARTİSİ GENEL MERKEZİMİZDE HEP BİRLİKTE #HAYIR DEDİK". Evrensel Yol Partisi. 5 February 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
  112. "Aziz seçmenler". Büyük Türkiye Partisi. 10 February 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
  113. "Demokratik Genç Parti Added A New Photo. - Demokratik Genç Parti". Facebook. 29 January 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  114. "Kişiye göre Anayasa yapmak devlet olmakla çelişir – Türk Solu Gazetesi". Turksolu.com.tr. 13 February 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  115. "Referandum Açıklaması". Hakvehakikatpartisi.com. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  116. "Üç partiden referandumu boykot kararı". cumhuriyet.com.tr. Archived from the original on 4 March 2017. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  117. "Hanedan Reisi Dündar Osmanoğlu: Türkiye Rejimini Değil Sistemini Değiştiriyor". Habersitesi.com. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  118. "Müsiad Genel Başkanı Nail Olpak: - Bursa Haberleri". Milliyet.com.tr. 15 January 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  119. "Osmanlı Ocakları Derneği Genel Başkanı Canpolat: "Sandığa giderek 'evet' oyu kullanarak yetinmeyeceğiz"". Yesilafsin.com. 6 February 2017. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  120. rigobert (26 January 2017). "Memur-Sen'den referanduma destek! - Ekonomi Haberleri". Ekonomi.haber7.com. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  121. "TMMOB: Mücadele edeceğiz, 'Hayır' diyeceğiz, başaracağız". Evrensel.net. 4 February 2017. Archived from the original on 10 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  122. "TTB Başkanı Raşit Tükel: Baskı ve zulme karşı "Hayır"". Birgun.net. 29 January 2017. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  123. "Dissidents from opposition MHP form group to say "No" in Turkey's referendum - POLITICS". Hurriyetdailynews.com. 13 September 2011. Archived from the original on 14 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  124. "Destici'nin kararı, BBP'yi bağlamaz". Sözcü. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 10 March 2017.
  125. "Referandumda 'Hayır' diyeceğini açıklayan Kamu-Sen'e saldırı". Yenicaggazetesi.com.tr. 25 January 2017. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  126. "KESK, Başkanlık Referandumuna "HAYIR" diyor". Birgun.net. 31 January 2017. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  127. "DİSK (Referandum kararı) : Memleketin ve işçilerin geleceği için 'hayır' - İstanbul Haberleri". Hurriyet.com.tr. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  128. "Başkanlik Rejimine Hayir! Yaşasin Cumhuriyet Yaşasin Demokrasi". Birlesikkamuis.org.tr. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  129. "NEDEN HAYIR DİYORUZ? - Atatürkçü Düşünce Derneği". 12 February 2017. Archived from the original on 12 February 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  130. "Teröre Karşı Birliğe Evet, Başkanlığa Hayır!". Tgb.gen.tr. 17 January 2017. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  131. "Gerici Anayasaya Hayır | Cumhuriyet Kadınları Derneği". Cumhuriyetkadinlari.org.tr (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  132. "Emekli subaylar referandum oyunu açıkladı". Ulusalkanal.com.tr. 31 January 2017. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  133. "Bu rest 'televole'den değil!." 11 February 2017. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 16 April 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  134. "Sanatçılar Girişimi: Cumhuriyetin idam fermanına hayır! | soL Haber Portalı". Sol (in Turkish). 2 February 2017. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  135. "Türk Hukuk Kurumu Başkanlarının Yüce Türk Ulusu'na Seslenişi". Turk Hukuk Kurumu. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  136. "Milli Anayasa Hareketi Başkanı Hasan Korkmazcan: Millet, egemenliğinden vazgeçmeyecektir". Ulusalkanal.com.tr. 21 January 2017. Archived from the original on 11 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  137. "Acı Gerçekleri Örten Evet-Hayır Maçı… – Aydınlar Ocağı". Aydinlarocagi.org. Archived from the original on 19 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  138. "Kılıçdaroğlu, 'Hayır Platformu' üyelerini kabul etti". Aa.com.tr. 17 February 2017. Archived from the original on 19 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  139. "TOPLUMSAL DÜŞÜNCE DERNEĞİ: Tek Adam Yönetimine ve Sultanlığa HAYIR!, Toplumsal Düşünce Derneği Gn. Başkanı Av. Fethi BOLAYIR". Toplumsaldd.blogspot.com.tr. 19 May 2012. Archived from the original on 18 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  140. "Referandumda çıkacak her iki sonuç için de bu doğrudur diyemiyoruz". Ilkha.com. 31 January 2017. Archived from the original on 8 February 2017. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  141. "AKP ve MHP'nin ilk ortak mitingi Çanakkale'de | Siyaset Haberleri". Gazetevatan.com. Archived from the original on 23 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  142. "Binali Yıldırım: PKK, FETO, HDP 'Hayır' diyor onun için 'Evet' diyoruz". Archived from the original on 4 March 2017. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
  143. "Erdoğan 'hayır' diyenleri darbeci ilan etti – Sözcü Gazetesi". Sozcu.com.tr. 13 February 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  144. "Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan Kahramanmaraş'ta - Son Dakika Haberler". Sabah.com.tr. 17 February 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  145. "MHP lideri Devlet Bahçeli Konya'da". Ensonhaber.com. 11 February 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  146. "BBP, referandum kararını açıkladı | Gündem". Dunya.com. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  147. "Sivas'ta Destici'ye referandum protestosu". Yenicaggazetesi.com.tr. 9 March 2017. Archived from the original on 11 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  148. "MHP'de, 'hayırcılar'dan toplu istifa". Birgun.net. 24 January 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  149. "MHP'de toplu istifa - CNN TÜRK - tarafsız güvenilir haberler". Cnnturk.com. 21 January 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  150. Sözcü Ankara (28 January 2017). "MHP yönetiminde art arda istifalar! – Sözcü Gazetesi". Sozcu.com.tr. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  151. "'MHP'nin yüzde 80'i hayır diyecek'". Birgun.net. 23 February 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  152. "BBP'de 'referandum' çatlaÄÄą - GĂźndem". T24. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.[check spelling][dead link]
  153. "MHP'li Halaçoğlu: MHP'nin yüzde 90'ı 'hayır' oyu verecek – Sözcü Gazetesi". Sozcu.com.tr. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  154. "Deniz Baykal Fransa'da 'hayır' istedi" (in Turkish). En Son Haber. 7 March 2017. Archived from the original on 17 April 2017. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
  155. "Türkei - "Nein"-Partei gegen allmächtigen Erdogan gegründet". Deutschlandfunk (in German). Archived from the original on 11 March 2018. Retrieved 11 March 2018.
  156. Türkei: NEIN-Partei bekämpft Erdogans Präsidentschaftspläne | Europamagazin (in German), archived from the original on 11 March 2018, retrieved 11 March 2018
  157. ""HAYIR PARTİSİ" KARAMAN'DA GAZETECİLERLE BULUŞTU". imaret.com.tr (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 17 November 2017. Retrieved 11 March 2018.
  158. "Hayır Partisi'nin kurucusu Bekleviç: 'AK Parti bitti, ciğerini". birgun.net. Archived from the original on 11 March 2018. Retrieved 11 March 2018.
  159. "İşimiz ülkenin tapusunu hiç kimseye vermemek!" (in Turkish). Sozcu. Archived from the original on 17 April 2017. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
  160. "CHP, 'hayÄąr' diyenlere baskÄąyÄą 78 maddeyle raporladÄą - GĂźndem". T24. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  161. "CHP'li Öztürk Yılmaz: 'Hayır' diyenler baskı altında". Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 10 March 2017.
  162. "CHP'li Engin Altay: Bu kötü bir haber". Archived from the original on 16 March 2017. Retrieved 10 March 2017.
  163. "Vapurda 'Hayır' şarkısı söyleyen gençlere gözaltıyı yolcular". Birgun.net. 24 January 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  164. "Hayır dediğim için gözaltına alındım". Gazeteduvar.com.tr. 31 January 2017. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  165. "Bursa'da 'hayır' oyu vereceğini açıklayan bir yurttaş, 'muhbir vatandaş' tarafından ihbar edilerek tutuklandı". Gazete Yolculuk. 3 March 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  166. Mehmet Emin Caliskan (11 April 2017). "With media muzzled, Turkish "No" voters seek alternative channels". Reuters.com. Archived from the original on 30 September 2017. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  167. Freemuse. "Austria/Turkey: Concert cancelled, song banned related to referendum vote". Freemuse. Archived from the original on 3 February 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  168. "Evet baskısı: Meral Akşener'in toplantı afişlerini de söktüler - www.viratrabzon.com | Trabzon İnternet Gazetesi". www.viratrabzon.com. 9 March 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  169. "Milliyetçilere iptal, baskı ve saldırılar sürüyor!". Yenicaggazetesi.com.tr. 8 March 2017. Archived from the original on 10 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  170. Emrullah Bayrak (20 June 2014). "Meral Akşener'in konuşma yaptığı salonda elektrikler kesildi". Ocak Medya. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  171. "Meral Akşener'in 'hayır' toplantısına engelleme". Birgun.net. 11 February 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  172. Barış Yarkadaş (11 February 2017). "Meral Akşener'e engelleme girişimi - Gerçek Gündem". Gercekgundem.com. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  173. Gold, Shabtai; Merey, Can; Say, Linda. "Turkish law prohibits campaigning abroad - as row with Europe deepens". Deutsche Presse-Agentur. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  174. "Danimarka, Yıldırım'dan ziyareti iptal etmesini istedi". Birgun.net. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  175. Sozcu.com.tr. "Almanya Bekir Bozdağ'a verdiği miting iznini geri çekti – Sözcü Gazetesi". Sozcu.com.tr. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  176. Birazdan 20:41 - 21:00 VOA - TGRT Haber (3 March 2017). "Türkiye'den Almanya'ya 'Skandal ve Çifte Standart' Tepkisi" (in Turkish). Amerikaninsesi.com. Archived from the original on 4 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  177. Birazdan 20:41 - 21:00 VOA - TGRT Haber (6 March 2017). "Erdoğan'ın Nazi Benzetmesine Almanya'dan Yanıt" (in Turkish). Amerikaninsesi.com. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  178. Birazdan 20:41 - 21:00 VOA - TGRT Haber (3 March 2017). "Erdoğan Almanya'yı Teröre Yardım ve Yataklıkla Suçladı" (in Turkish). Amerikaninsesi.com. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  179. Birazdan 20:41 - 21:00 VOA - TGRT Haber (7 March 2017). "Çavuşoğlu Hamburg Konuşmasını Başkonsolosluk Rezidansında Yapacak" (in Turkish). Amerikaninsesi.com. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  180. Birazdan 20:41 - 21:00 VOA - TGRT Haber (7 March 2017). "Baykal'dan Almanya Gezisi İptal Açıklaması" (in Turkish). Amerikaninsesi.com. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  181. "Hollanda gözaltı sayısını açıkladı! - DÜNYA Haberleri". Haber7.com. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  182. "Hollanda Başbakanı Rutte'dan yeni açıklama". Yenicaggazetesi.com.tr. 12 March 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  183. "Hollanda Başbakanı Rutte'den iptal kararıyla ilgili açıklama - Dünya Haberleri". Milliyet.com.tr. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  184. "Meral Akşener'den Hollanda yorumu: Avrupa'ya dövdürmeyiz". Abcgazetesi.com. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  185. "Kılıçdaroğlu Hollanda'ya kızdı, CHP tüm yurtdışı programını iptal etti | soL Haber Portalı". Sol (in Turkish). Haber.sol.org.tr. 11 March 2017. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  186. "Turkey's Erdoğan calls Dutch authorities 'Nazi remnants' - BBC News". BBC News. 11 March 2017. Archived from the original on 9 October 2018. Retrieved 13 March 2017.
  187. "Yüksek Seçim Kurulu 560 No'lu Kararı" (PDF). Yüksek Seçim Kurulu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 April 2018. Retrieved 4 May 2017. Translation of the text: "PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTMay 31, 2022 - It is claimed that some of the minutes to be used by ballot box committees in the elections were made illegally in the posts made on various social media. - The allegations made in the posts are unfounded and the minutes prepared in accordance with the election legislation come into force in the annex of the circulars and resolutions published in the Official Gazette regarding the implementation of the elections in each election calendar period. Since political party representatives in the Supreme Election Board also attend all board meetings regarding circulars and policy decisions, there is no question of making any changes in the minutes used in the elections without the knowledge of the public and political parties. - The minutes that are still in the Election Information System (SEÇSİS) and are being used are the minutes that were prepared in accordance with the laws and used in line with the decisions of the Supreme Election Board in the general elections held in 2018. - It is announced to the public with respect" This clearly does not contain any info regarding alternative security measures apart from the stamps.
  188. "Yüksek Seçim Kurulu 573 No'lu Kararı" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 September 2017. Retrieved 4 May 2017.
  189. "Here's why Turkish opposition parties are contesting the referendum results". Washington Post. 16 April 2017. Archived from the original on 19 April 2017. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
  190. Kingsley, Patrick (16 April 2017). "Erdoğan Claims Vast Powers in Turkey After Narrow Victory in Referendum". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 19 April 2017. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  191. "Erdoğan'dan şirketlere 'anket' talimatı: 'Durdurun'". Archived from the original on 8 March 2017. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
  192. "Başkanlık sistemi haftaya meclise geliyor - TÜRKİYE - DW.COM - 01.12.2016". Deutsche Welle. 2 December 2016. Archived from the original on 2 December 2016. Retrieved 16 April 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  193. "AKP ve MHP Anayasa metninde uzlaştı... Uzmanlar uyarıyor: 15 Temmuz anayasası - Cumhuriyet Siyaset Haberleri". Cumhuriyet.com.tr. 8 December 2016. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  194. "AKP'nin MHP'ye götüreceği başkanlık teklifi belli oldu". Abcgazetesi.com. 31 October 2016. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  195. "Reactions: Turkey urged to heal divisions after poll". 18 April 2017. Archived from the original on 31 August 2017. Retrieved 20 April 2017.
  196. "World leaders congratulate Erdoğan on referendum win". Anadolu Agency. Archived from the original on 14 April 2018. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  197. "Erdoğan set to visit China in May to join "Belt and Road Summit"". Hürriyet Daily News. Archived from the original on 17 May 2017. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  198. "European Leaders Say Vote Shows 'Deeply Divided' Turkey". Archived from the original on 21 October 2018. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  199. "Germany glad bitter Turkish referendum campaign over: foreign minister". Archived from the original on 3 April 2018. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
  200. "President, PM congratulate Erdoğan, Turkish people on referendum". Archived from the original on 20 March 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  201. "Putin congratulates Erdoğan on outcome of Turkey's Constitutional referendum". Trend.Az (in Russian). 18 April 2017. Archived from the original on 22 June 2017. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  202. Al-awsat, Asharq (18 April 2017). "Saudi Arabia Congratulates Turkey on Successful Referendum Process - ASHARQ AL-AWSAT English". ASHARQ AL-AWSAT English. Archived from the original on 17 May 2017. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  203. "Trump Called Erdoğan to Congratulate Him on Referendum Results". Haaretz. Reuters. 18 April 2017. Archived from the original on 17 September 2017. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  204. Boffey, Daniel (18 April 2017). "Turkey should investigate referendum vote 'irregularities', says EU commission". The Guardian. London. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 28 May 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2017.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article 2017_Turkish_constitutional_referendum, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.